Section 80.32. Permanent disabilities.  


Latest version.
Cr. Register, October, 1965, No. 118 , eff. 11-1-65; r. and recr. Register, April, 1975, No. 232 , eff. 5-1-75; r. and recr. (1), Register, September, 1982, No. 321 , eff. 10-1-82; cr. (13) and (14), Register, September, 1986 , eff. 369, eff. 10-1-86; am. (intro.), (3) to (5), (7), (9), (11) and (12) (a) and (b), Register, June, 1994, No. 462 , eff. 7-1-94; reprinted to restore dropped copy in (1), Register, March, 1995, No. 471 ; CR 07-019 : am. (11), Register October 2007 No. 622 , eff. 11-1-07.

Note

An example would be where in addition to a described loss of motion, pain and circulatory disturbance further limits the use of an arm or a leg. A meniscectomy in a knee with less than a good result would call for an estimate higher than 5% loss of use of the leg at the knee. The same principle would apply to surgical procedures on the back. The schedule of minimum disabilities contained in this section was adopted upon the advice of a worker's compensation advisory council subcommittee after a survey of doctors experienced in treating industrial injuries. Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1 All ranges of joint motion or degrees of ankylosis not listed below are to be interpolated from existing percent of disability listed. Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1 It is the subcommittee's intention that a separate minimum 5% allowance be given for every surgical procedure (open or closed, radical or partial) that is done to relieve from the effects of a disc lesion or spinal cord pressure. Each disc treated or surgical procedure performed will qualify for a 5% rating. Due to the fact a fusion involves 2 procedures a 1) laminectomy (dissectomy) and a 2) fusion procedure, 10% permanent total disability will apply when the 2 surgical procedures are done at the same time or separately. - See PDF for table PDF - See PDF for table PDF Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1