Section 463.07. Monitoring to demonstrate continuous compliance.

  The owner or operator of an affected source subject to the emission limitations of this subchapter shall conduct monitoring according to the type of air pollution control technique that is used to comply with the emission limitation. The monitoring required to demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission limitations is identified in this section for the air pollution control techniques expected to be used by the owners or operators of affected sources.

(1)   Composite mesh-pad systems.

(a) During the initial performance test, the owner or operator of an affected source, or a group of affected sources under common control, complying with the emission limitations in s. NR 463.04 through the use of a composite mesh-pad system shall determine the outlet chromium concentration using the test methods and procedures in s. NR 463.09 (3) , and shall establish as a site-specific operating parameter the pressure drop across the system, setting the value that corresponds to compliance with the applicable emission limitation, using the procedures in s. NR 463.09 (4) (e) . An owner or operator may conduct multiple performance tests to establish a range of compliant pressure drop values, or may set as the compliant value the average pressure drop measured over the 3 test runs of one performance test and accept ± 2 inches of water column from this value as the compliant range. 

(b) On and after the date on which the initial performance test is required to be completed under s. NR 460.06 , the owner or operator of an affected source, or group of affected sources under common control, shall monitor and record the pressure drop across the composite mesh-pad system once each day that any affected source is operating. To be in compliance with the standards in s. NR 463.04 , the composite mesh-pad system shall be operated within ± 2 inches of water column of the pressure drop value established during the initial performance test, or shall be operated within the range of compliant values for pressure drop established during multiple performance tests.

(c) The owner or operator of an affected source complying with the emission limitation of s. NR 463.04 through the use of a composite mesh-pad system may repeat the performance test and establish as a new site-specific operating parameter the pressure drop across the composite mesh-pad system according to the requirements in par. (a) or (b) . To establish a new site-specific operating parameter for pressure drop, the owner or operator shall satisfy all of the following requirements:

1. Determine the outlet chromium concentration using the test methods and procedures in s. NR 463.09 (3) .

2. Establish the site-specific operating parameter value using the procedures in s. NR 463.09 (4) .

3. Satisfy the recordkeeping requirements in s. NR 463.103 .

4. Satisfy the reporting requirements in s. NR 463.106 .

(d) The requirement to operate a composite mesh-pad system within the range of pressure drop values established under pars. (a) to (c) does not apply during the automatic-washdown cycles of the composite-mesh pad system.

(2)   Packed-bed scrubber systems.

(a) During the initial performance test, the owner or operator of an affected source, or group of affected sources under common control, complying with the emission limitations in s. NR 463.04 through the use of a packed-bed scrubber system shall determine the outlet chromium concentration using the procedures in s. NR 463.09 (3) , and shall establish as site-specific operating parameters the pressure drop across the system and the velocity pressure at the common inlet of the control device, setting the value that corresponds to compliance with the applicable emission limitation using the procedures in s. NR 463.09 (4) (d) and (e) . An owner or operator may conduct multiple performance tests to establish a range of compliant operating parameter values. Alternatively, the owner or operator may set as the compliant value the average pressure drop and inlet velocity pressure measured over the 3 test runs of one performance test, and accept ± 1 inch of water column from the pressure drop value and ± 10% from the velocity pressure value as the compliant range.

(b) On and after the date on which the initial performance test is required to be completed under s. NR 460.06 , the owner or operator of an affected source, or group of affected sources under common control, shall monitor and record the velocity pressure at the inlet to the packed-bed scrubber and the pressure drop across the scrubber system once each day that any affected source is operating. To be in compliance with the standards in s. NR 463.04 , the scrubber system shall be operated within ± 10% of the velocity pressure value established during the initial performance test, and within ± 1 inch of water column of the pressure drop value established during the initial performance test, or within the range of compliant operating parameter values established during multiple performance tests.

(3)   Packed-bed scrubber/composite mesh-pad system. The owner or operator of an affected source, or group of affected sources under common control, that uses a packed-bed scrubber in conjunction with a composite mesh-pad system to meet the emission limitations of s. NR 463.04 shall comply with the monitoring requirements for composite mesh-pad systems as identified in sub. (1) .

(4)   Fiber-bed mist eliminator.

(a) During the initial performance test, the owner or operator of an affected source, or group of affected sources under common control, complying with the emission limitations in s. NR 463.04 through the use of a fiber-bed mist eliminator shall determine the outlet chromium concentration using the procedures in s. NR 463.09 (3) , and shall establish as a site-specific operating parameter the pressure drop across the fiber-bed mist eliminator and the pressure drop across the control device installed upstream of the fiber bed to prevent plugging, setting the value that corresponds to compliance with the applicable emission limitation using the procedures in s. NR 463.09 (4) (e) . An owner or operator may conduct multiple performance tests to establish a range of compliant pressure drop values, or may set as the compliant value the average pressure drop measured over the 3 test runs of one performance test and accept ± 1 inch of water column from this value as the compliant range.

(b) On and after the date on which the initial performance test is required to be completed under s. NR 460.06 , the owner or operator of an affected source, or group of affected sources under common control, shall monitor and record the pressure drop across the fiber-bed mist eliminator, and the control device installed upstream of the fiber bed to prevent plugging, once each day that any affected source is operating. To be in compliance with the standards in s. NR 463.04 , the fiber-bed mist eliminator and the upstream control device shall be operated within ± 1 inch of water column of the pressure drop value established during the initial performance test, or shall be operated within the range of compliant values for pressure drop established during multiple performance tests.

(5)   Wetting agent-type or combination wetting agent-type/foam blanket fume suppressants.

(a) During the initial performance test, the owner or operator of an affected source complying with the emission limitations in s. NR 463.04 through the use of a wetting agent in the electroplating or anodizing bath shall determine the outlet chromium concentration using the procedures in s. NR 463.09 (3) . The owner or operator shall establish as the site-specific operating parameter the surface tension of the bath using Method 306B in Appendix A of 40 CFR part 63 , incorporated by reference in s. NR 484.04 (25) , setting the maximum value that corresponds to compliance with the applicable emission limitation. In lieu of establishing the maximum surface tension during the performance test, the owner or operator may accept 45 dynes/cm (3.1 x 10 -3 pound-force per foot (lb f /ft)) as measured by a stalagmometer or 35 dynes/cm (2.4 x 10 -3 lb f /ft) as measured by a tensiometer as the maximum surface tension value that corresponds to compliance with the applicable emission limitation. However, the owner or operator is exempt from conducting a performance test only if the criteria of s. NR 463.06 (3) (b) are met.

(b) On and after the date on which the initial performance test is required to be completed under s. NR 460.06 , the owner or operator of an affected source shall monitor the surface tension of the electroplating or anodizing bath. Operation of the affected source at a surface tension greater than the value established during the performance test or greater than 45 dynes/cm (3.1 x 10 -3 lb f /ft) as measured by a stalagmometer or 35 dynes/cm (2.4 x 10 -3 lb f /ft) as measured by a tensiometer if the owner or operator is using this value in accordance with par. (a) , shall constitute noncompliance with the standards in s. NR 463.04 . The surface tension shall be monitored according to the following schedule:

1. The surface tension shall be measured once every 4 hours during operation of the tank with a stalagmometer or a tensiometer as specified in Method 306B in Appendix A of 40 CFR part 63 , incorporated by reference in s. NR 484.04 .

2. The time between monitoring may be increased if there have been no exceedances. The surface tension shall be measured once every 4 hours of tank operation for the first 40 hours of tank operation after the compliance date. Once there are no exceedances during 40 hours of tank operation, surface tension measurement may be conducted once every 8 hours of tank operation. Once there are no exceedances during 40 more hours of tank operation, surface tension measurement may be conducted once every 40 hours of tank operation on an ongoing basis, until an exceedance occurs. The minimum frequency of monitoring allowed by this subchapter is once every 40 hours of tank operation.

3. Once an exceedance occurs as indicated through surface tension monitoring, the original monitoring schedule of once every 4 hours shall be resumed. A subsequent decrease in frequency shall follow the schedule laid out in subd. 2. For example, if an owner or operator had been monitoring an affected source once every 40 hours and an exceedance occurs, subsequent monitoring would take place once every 4 hours of tank operation. Once an exceedance does not occur for 40 hours of tank operation, monitoring may occur once every 8 hours of tank operation. Once an exceedance does not occur for 40 hours of tank operation on this schedule, monitoring may occur once every 40 hours of tank operation.

(c) Once a bath solution is drained from the affected tank and a new solution added, the original monitoring schedule of once every 4 hours shall be resumed, with a decrease in monitoring frequency allowed following the procedures of par. (b) 2. and 3.

(6)   Foam blanket-type fume suppressants.

(a) During the initial performance test, the owner or operator of an affected source complying with the emission limitations in s. NR 463.04 through the use of a foam blanket in the electroplating or anodizing bath shall determine the outlet chromium concentration using the procedures in s. NR 463.09 (3) , and shall establish as the site-specific operating parameter the thickness of the foam blanket, setting the minimum thickness that corresponds to compliance with the applicable emission limitation. In lieu of establishing the minimum foam blanket thickness during the performance test, the owner or operator may accept 2.54 centimeters (1 inch) as the minimum foam blanket thickness that corresponds to compliance with the applicable emission limitation. All foam blanket measurements shall be taken in close proximity to the workpiece or cathode area in the plating tank.

(b) On and after the date on which the initial performance test is required to be completed under s. NR 460.06 , the owner or operator of an affected source shall monitor the foam blanket thickness of the electroplating or anodizing bath. Operation of the affected source at a foam blanket thickness less than the value established during the performance test, or less than 2.54 cm (1 inch) if the owner or operator is using this value in accordance with par. (a) , constitutes noncompliance with the standards in s. NR 463.04 . The foam blanket thickness shall be measured according to the following schedule:

1. The foam blanket thickness shall be measured once every hour of tank operation.

2. The time between monitoring may be increased if there have been no exceedances. The foam blanket thickness shall be measured once every hour of tank operation for the first 40 hours of tank operation after the compliance date. Once there are no exceedances for 40 hours of tank operation, foam blanket thickness measurement may be conducted once every 4 hours of tank operation. Once there are no exceedances during 40 more hours of tank operation, foam blanket thickness measurement may be conducted once every 8 hours of tank operation on an ongoing basis, until an exceedance occurs. The minimum frequency of monitoring allowed by this subchapter is once per 8 hours of tank operation.

3. Once an exceedance occurs as indicated through foam blanket thickness monitoring, the original monitoring schedule of once every hour shall be resumed. A subsequent decrease in frequency shall follow the schedule laid out in subd. 2. For example, if an owner or operator had been monitoring an affected source once every 8 hours and an exceedance occurs, subsequent monitoring would take place once every hour of tank operation. Once an exceedance does not occur for 40 hours of tank operation, monitoring may occur once every 4 hours of tank operation. Once an exceedance does not occur for 40 hours of tank operation on this schedule, monitoring may occur once every 8 hours of tank operation.

(c) Once a bath solution is drained from the affected tank and a new solution added, the original monitoring schedule of once every hour shall be resumed, with a decrease in monitoring frequency allowed following the procedures of par. (b) 2. and 3.

(7)   Fume suppressant/add-on control device.

(a) If the owner or operator of an affected source uses both a fume suppressant and add-on control device and both are needed to comply with the applicable emission limit, monitoring requirements as identified in subs. (1) to (6) , and the work practice standards of Table 1 of this subchapter, apply for each of the control techniques used.

(b) If the owner or operator of an affected source uses both a fume suppressant and add-on control device, but only one of these techniques is needed to comply with the applicable emission limit, monitoring requirements as identified in subs. (1) to (6) , and work practice standards of Table 1 of this subchapter, apply only for the control technique used to achieve compliance.

(8)   Use of an alternative monitoring method.

(a) Requests and approvals of alternative monitoring methods shall be considered in accordance with s. NR 460.07 (6) .

(b) After receipt and consideration of an application for an alternative monitoring method, the department may approve alternatives to any monitoring methods or procedures of this subchapter including, but not limited to, the following:

1. Alternative monitoring requirements when installation or use of monitoring devices specified in this subchapter would not provide accurate measurements due to interferences caused by substances within the effluent gases.

2. Alternative locations for installing monitoring devices when the owner or operator can demonstrate that installation at alternate locations will enable accurate and representative measurements.

Cr. Register, September, 1997, No. 501 , eff. 10-1-97; CR 05-039 : am. (1) (a), (b), (5) (a), (b) (intro.) and (7) (b), cr. (1) (c) and (d) Register February 2006 No. 602 , eff. 3-1-06; CR 04-023 : am. (intro.), (5) (b) 2., (6) (b) 2., (7) (a), (8) (b) (intro.) and 1. Register December 2008 No. 636 , eff. 1-1-09.