Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Rule Subject:
Administrative Orders and Contested Cases
Adm. Code Reference:
ATCP 1
Rules Clearinghouse #:
Not assigned
DATCP Docket #:
15-R-11
Rule Summary
The Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (D
epartment
) proposes a rule revision for ch.
ATCP 1
, Wis. Adm. Code, to allow division administrators or staff to issue most of the special orders under s.
ATCP 1.03
(2)
, Wis. Adm. Code. This will allow for clarification of
the
Secretary’s responsibility to hear any appeal of a special order under s.
ATCP 1.06
, Wis. Adm. Code. The proposed rule also amends s.
ATCP 1.05
(1)
and
(3) (f)
to clarify that, if a
division administrator is designated to sign a special order, then the complaint seeking the special order must be signed by a different designee within the division.
Currently, under s.
ATCP 1.03
(2)
, Wis. Adm. Code, some types of orders may be issued by
the Department’s
division administrators or staff, whil
e others may only be issued by the Department’s
Secretary or designee. Generally, all of these orders may be appealed under s.
ATCP 1.06
, Wis. Adm. Code.
The authority to grant or deny a request for hearing rests with the Secretary, under s.
ATCP 1.06
(3)
, Wis. Adm. Code. The Secretary may choose to be the decisionmaker in an informal hearing. In addition, the final decisionmaker for any contested case is either the Secretary, or a designated final decisionmaker appointed by the Secretary, as defined in s.
ATCP 1.01
(13)
, Wis. Adm. Code. If the Secretary, or other appointed final decisionmaker, is the only person who may issue an initial special order, the Secretary is precluded from exerci
sing appellate jurisdiction which
is a specific statutory duty of the Secretary. The Secretary has this appellate jurisdiction to ensure that decisions in individual cases, while conforming to the law, are consistent with similar past cases and harmonized with broader, important public policies also within the Secretary’s jurisdiction. These authorities granted to the Secretary should not be abrogated by a rule which limits, in large part, the Secretary’s roles as appellate decisionmaker harmonizing final decisions with public policies. If the rule is amended, allowing spe
cial orders to be issued by a
division administrator, the Secretary may then exercise the duty to oversee any division’s action by granting and deciding an informal hearing or contested case hearing, if the special order is appealed.
In addition, if a
division administrator may be designated to sign an initial special order, the division administrator must also designate another person to sign the complaint
seeking the special order. The proposed rule makes this amendment to the rule on division complaints.
The one special order that will continue to be signed by the Secretary
or his designee, and not by a
division, is an order determining claims in a recovery proceeding, under s.
ATCP 1.08
, Wis. Adm. Code. Pursuant to subch.
VII of ch. 126
, Wis. Stats., the Division of Trade and Consumer Protection initiates the proceeding and drafts a proposed order. Only the Secretary or appointed final decisionmaker may sign the final order in these cases, even where a contested case hearing is not needed. These claims determination orders a
re always a final order of the Department
, as are all decisions in other contested case proceedings and all are issued by the Secretary or final decisionmaker, pursuant to §
227.47(1)
, Stats.
Small Businesses
Affected
This rule change is anticipated to have no effect on small business
.
To the extent that the proposed rule allows the Secretary to fully exercise his or her appellate jurisdiction, this may have a positive impact in having the Secretary be able to review special orders in light of harmonizing, within the law, a final decision in a case, involving a small business, with broader public policies on issues involving small businesses.
Reporting, Bookkeeping and other Procedures
The rule would not require any additional reporting, bookkeeping, or other procedures.
Professional Skills Required
The proposed rule does not require any new professional skills.
Accommodation for Small Business
This rule change is anticipated to have no effect on small business
.
Conclusion
The provisions in this proposed rule will benefit those affected by a special order issued by the Department. By
allow
ing
the Secretary to fully exercise his or her appellate jurisdiction, th
ese changes
may have a positive impact in having the Secretary be able to review special orders in light of harmonizing, within the law, a final decision in a case,
involving a small business,
with broader public policies on issues involving small businesses.
This rule will not have a significant adverse effect on “small business” and is not subject to the delayed “small business” effective date provided in s.
227.22 (2) (e)
, Stats.
