The Governor approved this Statement of Scope on September 14, 2015.
Statement of Scope
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES
Relating to
:
|
Telecommunication
assistance for deaf, deaf blind, and severely hard of hearing
|
Type of Statement of Scope:
Original
1. Finding/nature of emergency (Emergency Rule only):
Not
A
pplicable
.
2
.
Detailed description of the objective of the
proposed
rule
:
The objective of the
proposed
rulemaking is to
update and clarify the rules to reflect current program operations
and the changes in technology
available to assist deaf, deafblind and
severely
hard of hearing persons that have occurred
since the rule was last revised in 2003.
3
.
Description of the existing policies relevant to the rule, new policies proposed to be included in the rule, and an analysis of policy alternatives
:
The Telecommunication Assistance Program
(TAP)
as defined by s.
46.297
, Stats.,
subject to the availability of funds, provide assistance to
income eligible deaf,
severely
hard
of
hearing
and
deafblind
persons to secure telecommunication devices capable of serving their needs.
Currently TAP
provides
co-payment assistance to
deaf, hard of hearing and deafblind persons
in collaboration with the Telecommunication Equipment Purchase Program
(TEPP) offered by the Public Service Commission
.
Under ch.
DHS 78
, to receive assistance from TAP, individuals must complete a TEPP application form, making it unclear that TAP is a separate and distinct program from TEPP. Chapter
DHS 78
also includes application processing procedures, and eligibility requirements.
The processes and procedures
currently prescribed in ch.
DHS 78
are outdated and do not reflect the program
’
s current needs and objectives
, and may not be accurate
.
The department proposes to update the rules to clarify
the
distinction between the department’s telecommunication assistance program and the universal service fund telecommunications equipment purchase program implemented by the Public Service Commission under s.196.218, Stats.; to clarify eligibility requirements; to revise application and processing requirements; to reflect current program operations; and to reflect the changes in technology available to assist the deaf, deafblind and severely hard of hearing persons that have occurred since the rule was last revised in 2003.
Alternatives
There are no reasonable alternatives to the rulemaking. The existing rule is outdated and does not
adequately reflect the purpose of s.
46.297
, Stats.
4
.
Detailed explanation of statutory authority for the rule
(including
the
statutory citation and language):
(1)
Assistance.
From the appropriation under
s.
20.435 (7) (d)
, the department shall, subject to the availability of funds, provide assistance to hearing-impaired persons to secure telecommunication devices capable of serving their needs. Except in extraordinary circumstances, the department shall purchase or provide funds for the purchase of telecommunication devices.
(2)
Eligibility.
A person is eligible to receive assistance under
sub. (1)
if
all of the following conditions are met:
(a)
The person is certified as deaf or severely hearing impaired by a physician, an audiologist licensed under
subch
.
II of ch. 459
or the department.
(b)
The adjusted gross income of the person's family is equal to or less than 200% of the poverty line established under
42 USC 9902
(2).
(3)
Hearing rights.
Any person aggrieved by a decision of the department under this section has a right to a contested case hearing under
ch.
227
.
(4)
D
epartmental
duties.
The department shall:
(a)
Promulgate rules necessary for the administration of this section.
(b)
Establish application procedures and determine eligibility.
Section
227.11 (2) (a)
,
Stats.,
reads
:
Rule-making authority is expressly conferred on an agency as follows:
(a)
Each agency may promulgate rules interpreting the provisions of any statute enforced or administered by the agency, if the agency considers it necessary to effectuate the purpose of the statute, but a rule is not valid if the rule exceeds the bounds of correct interpretation. All of the following apply to the promulgation of a rule interpreting the provisions of a statute enforced or administered by an agency:
1.
A statutory or nonstatutory provision containing a statement or declaration of legislative intent, purpose, findings, or policy does not confer rule-making authority on the agency or augment the agency's rule-making authority beyond the rule-making authority that is explicitly conferred on the agency by the legislature.
2.
A statutory provision describing the agency's general powers or duties does not confer rule-making authority on the agency or augment the agency's rule-making authority beyond the rule-making authority that is explicitly conferred on the agency by the legislature.
3.
A statutory provision containing a specific standard, requirement, or threshold does not confer on the agency the authority to promulgate, enforce, or administer a rule that contains a standard, requirement, or threshold that is more restrictive than the standard, requirement, or threshold contained in the statutory provision.
5
.
Estimate of amount of time that state employees will spend developing the rule and of other resources necessary to develop the rule
:
The
department
estimates that it will take approximately
200
hours of time.
The
d
epartment may consult with
the Governor’s
Council for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing.
6
.
List with description of all entities that
may
be affected by the proposed rule
:
The entities that may be affected by the proposed rule include individuals
applying for program assistance
;
telecommunication equipment vendors;
physicians
;
audiologists
;
the Wi
sconsin Association of the Deaf;
the Hearing Loss Association of America
;
and Hands and Voices of Wisconsin
.
7
.
Summary and preliminary comparison with any existing or proposed federal regulation that is intended to address the activities to be regulated by the proposed rule
:
There
are
no existing or proposed federal regulations that address the activities to be regulated by the rules.
8
. Anticipated economic impact of implementing the rule:
The proposed rule is anticipated to have little to no economic impact if promulgated
.
Contact Person:
Rosie Greer
608-266-1279
