STATEMENT OF SCOPE
DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT
Rule No.
Relating to
Procedures
of the Equal Rights Division
for investigations, hearings, decisions and enforcement in cases involving complaints of discrimination in employment, housing, public accommodations, public employee safety and health, whistleblower retaliation and family and medical leave
Rule Type
Permanent
Detailed Description of the Objective
s
of the Proposed Rule
Appeal of an initial determination of "no probable cause"
Under the current rule, there is no requirement that a complainant state any reason for an appeal. To reduce the resources devoted to frivolous appeals, the Department
of Workforce Development (DWD)
would like to consider an amendment to require that the complainant state the basis for the appeal in writing.
Interest rate
The current rule provisions reflect former statutory provisions which set the interest rate for an unpaid monetary award at an annual rate of 12%.
DWD
would like to consider an amendment to set the interest rate in the same manner as
s
.
815.05(8)
, Stats., does for court dec
isions, at the prime rate plus 1%
.
Place of hearing
The statutes require that the hearing should take place in the county of the alleged violation unless the respondent agrees to different location. To provide more flexibility in scheduling hearings, while maintaining the rights of the respondent,
DWD
would like to consider a rule change to permit the Equal Rights Division to initially set the hearing location, subject to approval by the respondent.
Description of Existing Policies Relevant to the Rule,
N
ew Policies Proposed to be Included in the Rule, and an Analysis of Policy Alternatives
Appeal of an initial determination of "no probable cause"
The principal alternative to the policy change under consideration would be to continue the current procedure, under which a "no probable cause" determination may be appealed without any statement of a reason for the appeal. This allow
s the filing and consideration
of an appeal that may later be found to be frivolous.
Interest rate
The principal alternative to the policy change under consideration would be to continue to have an interest rate for an unpaid monetary award that is currently much higher
than
the rate that applies to court judgments.
Place of hearing
The principal alternative to the policy change under consideration would be to continue the current procedure, under which the place of hearing is initially scheduled for a location in the county of the alleged violation.
Detailed Explanation of Statutory Authority for the Rule (Including the Statutory Citation and Language)
DWD has express
statutory authority
to make rules for the
procedures to be followed in investigations, hearings, decisions and enforcement in cases involving complaints of discrimination in employment, housing, public accommodations, public employee safety and health, whistleblower retaliation and family and medical leave.
Employment discrimination.
Section
111.375 (1)
,
Stats., provides: "
This subchapter shall be administered by the department. The department may make, amend and rescind such rules as are necessary to carry out this subchapter.
"
Open housing.
Section
106.50 (1s)
, Stats., provides: "This section shall be administered by the department through its division of equal rights. The department may promulgate such rules as are necessary to carry out this section. No rule may prohibit the processing of any class action complaint or the ordering of any class−based remedy, or may provide that complaints may be consolidated for administrative convenience only."
Public accommodations.
Sec
tion
106.52 (2)
, Stats., provides: "The department shall administer this section through its division of equal rights. The department may promulgate such rules as are necessary to carry out this section. No rule may prohibit the processing of any class action complaint or the ordering of any class−based remedy, and no rule may provide that complaints may be consolidated for administrative convenience only."
Public employee safety and health.
Section
103.005 (1)
, Stats., provides: " The department shall adopt reasonable and proper rules and regulations relative to the exercise of its powers and authorities and proper rules to govern its proceedings and to regulate the mode and manner of all investigations and hearings."
State employee whistleblower retaliation.
Section
230.89 (1)
, Stats., provides: "The division of equal rights shall promulgate rules to carry out its responsibilities under this subchapter."
Family
or
medical leave.
Section
103.005 (1)
, Stats., provides: "The department shall adopt reasonable and proper rules and regulations relative to the exercise of its powers and authorities and proper rules to govern its proceedings and to regulate the mode and manner of all investigations and hearings."
Estimate of Amount of Time that State Employees Will Spend Developing the Rule and of Other Resources Necessary to Develop the Rule
The estimated time is
40
hours.
List with Description of All Entities that May Be Affected by the Proposed Rule
Employment discrimination.
The rules will primarily affect employers and employees.
Open housing.
The rules will primarily affect those providing housing, lenders, and tenants or purchasers of housing.
Public accommodations.
The rules will primarily affect businesses and those alleging they have been subject to discrimination in places of public accommodation.
Summary and Preliminary Comparison with Any Existing or Proposed Federal Regulation
that is Intended to Address the Activities to be Regulated by the Proposed Rule
Employment discrimination.
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforces Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; the Equal Pay Act; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA); and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) which similarly prohibit discrimination in employment. There is no appeal of an adverse decision with EEOC; complainants can get a “right to sue” letter and take their claims directly into federal court.
Open housing.
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) enforces Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, the federal fair housing law, which similarly prohibits discrimination in housing. There is a reconsideration process if the HUD finds “no reasonable cause, but it does not involve a full evidentiary hearing. If complainants disagree after that process, they can sue in federal court. There are no procedures for appealing the initial decision, other than to request a reconsideration in writing.
Public accommodations.
The U.S. Department of Justice enforces Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which covers discrimination in the provision of public accommodations, but it only acts in cases where it believes there is a pattern and practice of discriminatory behavior. Individual complaints can be pursued in court. There is no appeal procedure with the US Department of Justice.
Public employee safety and health.
The U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) enforces federal workplace safety laws that cover the private sector. OSHA’s law contains an anti-retaliation provision. OSHA decides whether a violation occurred and the parties may object within 30 days of that finding. The letter of objection must explain whether the appellant disagrees with the findings and/or the order.
State employee whistleblower retaliation.
There are no federal regulations that cover similar whistleblower retaliation.
Family or medical leave.
The U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division, enforces the federal Family and Medical Leave Act, which also can be enforced by private lawsuit. There is no appeal of an adverse decision by the Wage and Hour Division as complainants can go directly into court without resort to the agency.
Anticipated Economic Impact of Implementing the Rule
(Note if the Rule is Likely to Have a Significant Economic Impact on Small Businesses)
The rule will have a positive economic impact by reducing the number of hearings facing
employers,
small businesses
or property owners
against whom an unsubstantiated complaint has been filed.
Contact Person
For program questions:
Larry Jakubowski, DWD Equal Rights Division
201 E. Washington Avenue, Madison WI 53703
For rulemaking questions:
Howard Bernstein,
Chief
Legal Counsel
DWD Office of the Secretary
P.O. Box 7946
Madison
,
WI 53707
Telephone:
(608) 266-9427
