SS_017-15 Grain dealers and grain warehouse keepers

 

Statement of Scope

Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP)

Rule No.:

Ch. ATCP 99 , Wis. Adm. Code ( Existing )

Relating to:

Grain Dealers and Grain Warehouse Keepers

1. Description of the objective of the rule:

The Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) propose s an emergency rule that will amend fund assessment exemption requirements for grain dealers and grain warehouse keepers . The emergency rule proposes a decrease in the agricultural producer security overall fund balance minimum requirement . This change would bring the minimum balance set by rule from $11 million to $5 million, which is the minimum set in s. 126.88 (1) (a) , Stats . Th e emergency rule is necessitated by the recent decrease in the agricultural producer security overall fund balance due to a large default claimed by the vegetable contractor industry (see history and background section below).

2. Description of existing policies relevant to the rule and of new policies proposed to be included in the rule and an analysis of policy alternatives; the history, background and justification for the proposed rule:

History and background .

The Agricultural Producer Security Fund (APSF) is a public trust administered by DATCP. Milk contractors, grain dealers, grain warehouse keepers and vegetable contractors (collectively known as contractors) must purchase a license to obtain milk, grain and vegetables, respectively, from producers, and most contractors are required to contribute to the APSF annually. Funds are used to settle claims by producers in the event that a contractor defaults on payment. Funds from each industry are accounted for separately and deposited into the overall fund. Ch. 126 , Stats., establishes detailed fund assessment requirements, except that it requires DATCP to establish milk contractor fund assessments by rule. Ch. 126 , Stats., sets minimum fund balances for each industry, as well as a minimum balance requirement for the overall fund.

Section ATCP 99.126 (5 ) , Admin. Code, establishes a fund assessment exemption for grain dealers . To be eligible, a licensee must have been a contributing grain dealer in each of the preceding 5 license years. The exemption does not apply if the fund balance attributable to grain dealers was less than $3 million on May 31 of the preceding license year. The exemption also does not apply if the overall fund balance (which includes contributions from milk, grain and vegetable industries) was less than $11 million on May 31 of the preceding license year. Section 126.88 , Stats., sets the overall fund minimum balance at $5 million.

Section ATCP 99.235 (4) , Admin. Code, establishes a fund assessment exemption for grain warehouse keepers with eligibility requirements similar to those for grain dealers. However, grain warehouse keeper licensees are not likely to become eligible for fund assessment exemption for approximately 10 years, as the fund balance attributable to grain w arehouse keep ers is currently a fraction of the minimum $ 500,000 requirement.

In 2014, the agricultural pr oducer security fund paid out claims to 19 vegetable producers due to payment default by one large, out-of-state contractor that went bankrupt. The default payment totaled $6. 1 million, causing the overall fund balance to drop by more than half. With the overall fund balance well below the $11 million minimum currently set in administrative code, the grain dealer and grain warehouse keeper industries will not be eligible for fund assessment exemption for an estimated 6-7 years.

DATCP and the Agricultur al Producer Security Council have identified the need to evaluate the entire agricultural producer security program, so that changes can be made to mitigate the impact of large defaults in the future. This entire process, including the performance of the actuarial study, will take more than a year.

The proposed emergency rule would alleviate a financial burden otherwise placed upon licensed grain dealers . Without this change, grain dealer s would no t be eligible for fund assessment exemption for many years , and would ultimately repay a large portion of the fund balance lost in the default to vegetable producers .

The proposed emergency rule would make consistent changes to exemption eligibility requirements for both grain dealers and grain warehouse keepers, however grain warehouse keeper licensees will not likely be effected by the change for approximately 10 years, as they will not meet the minimum balance requirement for funds attributable to grain warehouse keepers.

Nature of the Emergency

An emerge ncy rule is necessary to ensure the continuation of the fund assessment exemption for grain dealers while an actuarial study is conducted to determine what programmatic and statutory changes should be made. Without this emergency rule, licensed grain dealers will take on the burden of repaying a large portion of the agricultural producer security overall fund balance lost in the default to vegetable producers . An emergency rule effective date of September 1 is necessary, as the next license year for grain dealers and grain warehouse keepers begins September 1, 2015.

Policy Alternatives

Do nothing . If DATCP fails to adopt this emergency rule the grain dealer industry will not be eligible for fund assessment exemption until the producer security overall fund balance exceeds $11 million , which is estimated to take 6-7 years . If DATCP fails to adopt this emergency rule before September 1, 2015, no grain dealers will be eligible for exemption during the next license year.

3. Statutory authority for the rule (including the statutory citation and language):

Section 93.07 (1) , Stats., directs DATCP to make such regulations as are necessary for the discharge of all the powers and duties of the department.

Section 126.81 (1) (a) , Stats., allows DATCP to promulgate rules to interpret and implement Ch. 126 , Stats.

Section 227.24 , Stats., allows DATCP to promulgate a rule as an emergency rule without complying with the notice, hearing and publication requirements under ch. 227 , Stats.

4. Estimate of the amount of time that state employees will spend to develop the rule and of other resources necessary to develop the rule:

DATCP estimates tha t it will use approximately 0.10 FTE staff to develop this rule. This includes time required for the investigation and analysis, financial assistance criteria, rule drafting, preparing related documents, and communicating with affected persons and groups. DATCP will use existing staff to develop this rule.

5. Description of all entities that may be impacted by the rule:

The pro posed rule will allow grain dealers who meet fund assessment exemption requirements under ATCP 99.126 (5 ) (a) and (b) to not pay fund assessments if the producer security overall fund balance is at least $5 million on May 3 1 of the preceding license year. The grain dealer industry would otherwise be required to pay an additional $250,000 - $3 00,000 annually , until the overall fund balance reaches a minimum of $11 million.

Milk, grain and vegetable producers could potentially be impacted by the lower agricultural producer security overall fund balance , in the event of future large defaults.

6. Summary and preliminary comparison of any existing or proposed federal regulation that is intended to address the activities to be regulated by the rule:

There is no existing or proposed federal regulation that is int ended to address the activities regulated by this rule.

7. Anticipated economic impact

The proposed rule will slow the growth of the overall fund balance, as the grain dealer industry would otherwise be required to pay an additional $250,000 - $3 00,000 annually , over the course of an estimated 6-7 years . The impact to milk, grain and vegetable producers will be minimal if there are no large defaults during the next 6-7 years.

Contact Person: Carolann Nels on , DATCP; Phone [phone]

carolann.nelson @wi.gov