CR_14-002 Revises Chapters N 2 and 3, relating to licensure and examining councils.

Tax 11.67 (3) (m) (Note 1) Section Tax 11.67 interprets ss. 77.51 (1f) , (12) , (12m) , (13) , (14) (intro.) and (h) , (15a) , (15b) , (20) , and (22) (a) and (b) and 77.52 (1) , (2) (a) , (2m) (a) and (b) , and (20), and (21), Stats.

(Note 2) The interpretations in s. Tax 11.67 are effective under the general sales and use tax law on and after September 1, 1969, except that (a) The fees paid to architects performing landscaping planning became taxable effective May 1, 1982, pursuant to Chapter 317, Laws of 1981 ; (b) The definition of bundled transactions became effective October 1, 2009, pursuant to 2009 Wis. Act 2 ; and (c) The change of the term "gross receipts" to "sales price" and the separate impositions of tax on coins and stamps sold above face value under s. 77.52 (1) (b) , Stats., certain leased property affixed to real property under s. 77.52 (1) (c) , Stats., and digital goods under s. 77.52 (1) (d) , Stats., became effective October 1, 2009, pursuant to 2009 Wis. Act 2 ; and (d) The clarification that a service provider who transfers tangible personal property, or items, property, or goods under s. 77.52 (1) (b) , (c) , or (d) , Stats., incidentally with a taxable service is the consumer of such property, items, or goods became effective July 2, 2013, pursuant to 2013 Wis. Act 20 .

SECTION 33. Tax 11.68 (7) (b) is repealed and recreated to read:

Tax 11.68 (7) (b) 1. In this paragraph, "lump sum contract" means a contract to perform real property construction activities and to provide tangible personal property, items or property under s. 77.52 (1) (b) or (c) , Stats., or taxable services and for which the contractor quotes the charge for labor, services of subcontractors, tangible personal property, items and property under s. 77.52 (1) (b) and (c) , Stats., and taxable services as one price, including a contract for which the contractor itemizes the charges for labor, services of subcontractors, tangible personal property, items and property under s. 77.52 (1) (b) and (c) , Stats., and taxable services as part of a schedule of values or similar document.

2. A contractor's sales price of a lump sum contract is exempt from tax if the total sales price of all taxable products and services sold by the contractor as a part of the lump sum contract is less than 10 percent of the total amount of the lump sum contract. Except as provided in subd. 3., the contractor is the consumer of such taxable products and must pay tax on its purchase of the taxable products.

3. If the lump sum contract is entered into with an entity that is exempt from taxation under s. 77.54 (9a) , Stats., the contractor is the consumer of all taxable products used by the contractor in real property construction activities, but the contractor may purchase without tax, for resale, tangible personal property, items and property under s. 77.52 (1) (b) and (c) , Stats., and taxable services that are sold by the contractor as part of the lump sum contract with the entity and that are not consumed by the contractor in real property construction activities.

SECTION 34. Tax 11.68 (13) (e) (Note 1) and (Note 2) are amended to read:

Tax 11.68 (13) (e) (Note 1) Section Tax 11.68 interprets ss. 77.51 (2) , (12m) (b) 7. , (14) (intro.) , (15a) (b) 1. and 4. , (15b) (b) 7. , 77.52 (2) (a) 10. , 11. , and 20. , 77.53 (1) , 77.54 (5) (d) , (6) (a) , (26) , (26m) , (31) , and (41), and (60), 77.71 (3), and 77.77 (3), Stats.

(Note 2) The interpretations in s. Tax 11.68 are effective under the general sales and use tax law on and after September 1, 1969, except: (a) Vault doors were not considered personal property until August 1, 1975; (b) Service station equipment such as underground tanks, gasoline pumps and hoists installed in or securely attached to their owner's land was real property, but the property was personal property if the personal property and land were owned by different persons prior to August 1, 1975; (c) Advertising signs were real property if erected on and securely attached to the owner's land prior to August 1, 1975; (d) Landscaping services became taxable effective May 1, 1982, pursuant to Chapter 317, Laws of 1981 ; (e) The exemption for waste reduction and recycling machinery and equipment became effective July 1, 1984, pursuant to 1983 Wis. Act 426 ; (f) The exemption for mobile units used for mixing and processing became effective July 20, 1985, pursuant to 1985 Wis. Act 29 ; (g) The credit for local sales taxes paid to other states became effective April 1, 1986, pursuant to 1987 Wis. Act 27 ; (h) The exemption for safety attachments for manufacturing machines became effective June 1, 1986, pursuant to 1985 Wis. Act 149 ; (i) The exemption of 35% of the selling price of new mobile homes and 100% of the selling price of used mobile homes became effective January 1, 1987, pursuant to 1985 Wis. Act 29 ; (j) The exemption for property used in constructing professional sports and home entertainment stadiums became effective October 1, 1991, pursuant to 1991 Wis. Act 37 ; (k) The 35% reduction in gross receipts for new mobile homes transported in 2 unattached sections became effective October 1, 1991, pursuant to 1991 Wis. Act 39 ; (L) Tangible personal property purchased outside Wisconsin, stored in Wisconsin and subsequently used outside Wisconsin became taxable October 1, 1991, pursuant to 1991 Wis. Act 39 ; (m) Raw materials purchased outside Wisconsin, manufactured, fabricated or otherwise altered by the contractor outside Wisconsin and used in real property construction by the contractor in Wisconsin became subject to use tax effective August 12, 1993, pursuant to 1993 Wis. Act 16 ; (n) In Tom Kuehne Landscape Contractor, Inc. vs. Wisconsin Department of Revenue, Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District IV, No. 86-1813, October 29, 1987 (CCH 202-919), highway signs, sign bridges, delineator posts and guardrails were found to remain tangible personal property after installation; (o) The stadium tax on building materials became effective January 1, 1996, pursuant to 1995 Wis. Act 56 ; (p) The change to the definition of "real property construction activities" to include only those activities that take place at a site where tangible personal property is affixed to real property became effective for sales of property pursuant to contracts entered into on or after December 1, 1997, pursuant to 1997 Wis. Act 27 ; (q) The clarification of the tax treatment of the original installation or complete replacement of certain deemed items became effective on October 1, 2001, pursuant to 2001 Wis. Act 16 ; (r) The changes in the use of the terms mobile homes and manufactured homes became effective January 1, 2008, pursuant to 2007 Wis. Act 11 ; (s) The change of the term "gross receipts" to "sales price" and the separate impositions of tax on coins and stamps sold above face value under s. 77.52 (1) (b) , Stats., certain leased property affixed to real property under s. 77.52 (1) (c) , Stats., and digital goods under s. 77.52 (1) (d) , Stats., became effective October 1, 2009, pursuant to 2009 Wis. Act 2 ; and (t) The exemption for modular homes and manufactured homes used in real property construction activities outside Wisconsin became effective September 1, 2011 pursuant to 2011 Wis. Act 32 ; and (u) The exemption for lump sum contracts first applied to contracts entered into on or after October 1, 2013, pursuant to 2013 Wis. Act 20 .

SECTION 35. Tax 11.70 (2) (e) and (7) (b) (Note 2) and (Note 3) are amended to read:

Tax 11.70 (2) (e) Producing, fabricating, processing, printing, or imprinting tangible personal property or items, property, or goods under s. 77.52 (1) (b) , (c) , or (d) , Stats., for clients for a consideration, even though the client may furnish the materials used in producing, fabricating, processing, printing, or imprinting the property, items, or goods. However, the tax does not apply to the printing or imprinting of tangible personal property or items, property, or goods under s. 77.52 (1) (b) , (c) , or (d) , Stats., that results in printed material, catalogs, or envelopes that are exempt under s. 77.54 (25) , or (25m), or (59), Stats.

(7) (b) (Note 2) Section Tax 11.70 interprets ss. 77.51 (1f) , (1fr) , (3rm) , (14) (intro.) and (h) , 77.52 (1) and (2) , 77.522 , 77.54 (2) , (2m) , (6) (b) , (25) , (25m) , and (43), and (59), and 77.585 (8), Stats.

(Note 3) The interpretations in s. Tax 11.70 are effective under the general sales and use tax law on and after September 1, 1969, except: (a) The exemption for printing or imprinting of tangible personal property furnished by customers and used out-of-state for advertising became effective March 1, 1970; (b) The exemption for printed advertising material used out-of-state became effective May 21, 1972; (c) The exemption for ingredients or components of shoppers guides, newspapers, and periodicals became effective July 7, 1983; (d) The sales and use tax exemption for raw materials for printed materials transported and used solely outside Wisconsin became effective December 1, 1997, pursuant to 1997 Wis. Act 27 ; (e) The exemption for catalogs and their mailing envelopes became effective April 1, 2009, pursuant to 2007 Wis. Act 20 ; (f) The provision that items must be consumed exclusively and directly by a manufacturer in manufacturing property or items destined for sale became effective August 1, 2009, pursuant to 2009 Wis. Act 28 ; (g) The definitions of bundled transaction and finished artwork became effective October 1, 2009, pursuant to 2009 Wis. Act 2 ; (h) The change of the term "gross receipts" to "sales price" and the separate impositions of tax on coins and stamps sold above face value under s. 77.52 (1) (b) , Stats., certain leased property affixed to real property under s. 77.52 (1) (c) , Stats., and digital goods under s. 77.52 (1) (d) , Stats., became effective October 1, 2009, pursuant to 2009 Wis. Act 2 ; (i) The definition of "direct mail" became effective October 1, 2009 pursuant to 2009 Wis. Act 2 ; (j) The definition of "advertising and promotional direct mail" became effective May 27, 2010, pursuant to 2009 Wis. Act 330 ; and (k) The sales and use tax exemption for advertising and promotional direct mail became effective July 1, 2013, pursuant to 2011 Wis. Act 32 ; and (L) Services resulting in advertising and promotional direct mail were excluded from taxable services effective July 1, 2013, pursuant to 2013 Wis. Act 20 .

SECTION 36. Effective date. This rule shall take effect on the first day of the month following publication in the Wisconsin Administrative Register as provided in s. 227.22 (2) (intro.) , Stats.

ADMINISTRATIVE RULES FISCAL ESTIMATE AND ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Type of Estimate and Analysis
X Original ⍽ Updated ⍽ Corrected
Administrative Rule Chapter, Title and Number
Chapter Tax 11 — Sales and use tax
Subject
Sales and use tax provisions
Fund Sources Affected			Chapter 20 , Stats. Appropriations Affected
⍽ GPR ⍽ FED ⍽ PRO ⍽ PRS ⍽ SEG ⍽ SEG-S
Fiscal Effect of Implementing the Rule
X No Fiscal Effect ⍽ Indeterminate	⍽ Increase Existing Revenues ⍽ Decrease Existing Revenues		⍽ Increase Costs ⍽ Could Absorb Within Agency's Budget ⍽ Decrease Costs
The Rule Will Impact the Following (Check All That Apply)
⍽ State's Economy ⍽ Local Government Units		⍽ Specific Businesses/Sectors ⍽ Public Utility Rate Payers
Would Implementation and Compliance Costs Be Greater Than $20 million? ⍽ Yes X No
Policy Problem Addressed by the Rule
The rule does not create or revise policy, other than to reflect current law and department policy.
Summary of Rule's Economic and Fiscal Impact on Specific Businesses, Business Sectors, Public Utility Rate Payers, Local Governmental Units and the State's Economy as a Whole (Include Implementation and Compliance Costs Expected to be Incurred)
As indicated in the attached fiscal estimate, the proposed rule is intended to reflect law changes and clarify the tax treatment of certain items. Since the fiscal impact of the statutory changes has already been reflected, the proposed rule has no fiscal effect. No comments concerning the economic effect of the rule were submitted in response to the department's solicitation.
Benefits of Implementing the Rule and Alternative(s) to Implementing the Rule
Clarifications and guidance provided by administrative rules may lower the compliance costs for businesses, local governmental units, and individuals. If the rule is not implemented, Chapter Tax 11 will be incomplete in that it will not reflect current law or department policy.
Long Range Implications of Implementing the Rule
No long-range implications are anticipated.
Compare With Approaches Being Used by Federal Government
N/A
Compare With Approaches Being Used by Neighboring States (Illinois, Iowa, Michigan and Minnesota )
N/A

FISCAL ESTIMATE FORM				2013 Session
X ORIGINAL ⍽ UPDATED	LRB #
	INTRODUCTION #
⍽ CORRECTED ⍽ SUPPLEMENTAL	Admin. Rule #		Tax 11: 2013-15 budget
Subject
Proposed order of the Department of Revenue related to sales tax
Fiscal Effect
State:   X No State Fiscal Effect   Check columns below only if bill makes a direct appropriation or affects a sum sufficient appropriation   ⍽ Increase Existing Appropriation   ⍽ Increase Existing Revenues   ⍽ Decrease Existing Appropriation   ⍽ Decrease Existing Revenues   ⍽ Create New Appropriation			⍽ I ncrease Costs — May be Possible to Absorb Within Agency's Budget ⍽ Yes ⍽ No   ⍽ Decrease Costs

Local: X No Local Government Costs
1.   ⍽ Increase Costs	3.   ⍽ Increase Revenues		5.   Types of Local Governmental Units Affected:
⍽ Permissive ⍽ Mandatory	⍽ Permissive ⍽ Mandatory		⍽ Towns     ⍽ Villages   ⍽ Cities
2.   ⍽ Decrease Costs	4.   ⍽ Decrease Revenues		⍽ Counties ⍽ Others
⍽ Permissive ⍽ Mandatory	⍽ Permissive ⍽ Mandatory		⍽ School Districts ⍽ WTCS Districts
Fund Sources Affected ⍽ GPR ⍽ FED ⍽ PRO ⍽ PRS ⍽ SEG ⍽ SEG-S		Affected Ch. 20 Appropriations

Assumptions Used in Arriving at Fiscal Estimate:

The proposed rule updates Chapter TAX 11 of the Administrative Code, pertaining to the sales and use tax, to reflect certain sales tax changes contained in 2013 Wisconsin Act 20 , the 2013-15 Budget Bill.

The proposed rule modifies the administrative code to reflect law changes and clarify the tax treatment of certain items.

The proposed rule includes:

• A sales and use tax exemption for certain property sold by a contractor as part of a lump sum contract.

• Repeal of the sales tax imposition on receipts from self-service laundry machines that are operated by tokens and magnetic cards.

• A sales and use tax exemption for services resulting in advertising and promotional direct mail.

• A sales and use tax exemption for certain products used by commercial printers.

• Updates and clarifications to reflect changes to sales and use tax statutes.

• Dissolution of the Health Insurance Risk-Sharing Plan and Authority.

The fiscal effect of the exemptions created under 2013 Wisconsin Act 20 has already been reflected under general fund condition statements subsequent to 2013 Wisconsin Act 20 . Since the fiscal impact of the statutory changes has already been reflected, the proposed rule has no fiscal effect.

Notice of Hearing

Safety and Professional Services —
Board of Nursing

CR 14-002

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to authority vested in the Board of Nursing in ss. 15.08 (5) (b) and 441.01 (3) , Wis. Stats., and interpreting ss. 441.04 , 441.05 , 441.06 , 441.0,8 and 441.10 , Wis. Stats., the Board of Nursing will hold a public hearing at the time and place indicated below to consider an order to repeal and recreate Chapters N 2 and 3 , relating to nurse licensure and examining councils.

Hearing Information

Date:   Thursday, February 13, 2014
Time:   8:05 a.m.
Location:   1400 East Washington Avenue
  Room 121A
  Madison, Wisconsin

Appearances at the Hearing

Interested persons are invited to present information at the hearing. Persons appearing may make an oral presentation but are urged to submit facts, opinions and argument in writing as well. Facts, opinions and argument may also be submitted in writing without a personal appearance by mail addressed to the Department of Safety and Professional Services, Division of Policy Development, P.O. Box 8366, Madison, Wisconsin 53708. Written comments must be received at or before the public hearing to be included in the record of rule-making proceedings.

Place where Comments are to be Submitted and Deadline for Submission

Comments may be submitted to Sharon Henes, Administrative Rules Coordinator, Department of Safety and Professional Services, Division of Board Services, 1400 East Washington Avenue, Room 151, P.O. Box 8366, Madison, WI 53708-8935, or by email to [e-mail] . Comments must be received at or before the public hearing to be held on February 13, 2014 , to be included in the record of rule-making proceedings.

Copies of Rule

Copies of this proposed rule are available upon request to Sharon Henes, Administrative Rules Coordinator, Department of Safety and Professional Services, Division of Board Services, 1400 East Washington Avenue, P.O. Box 8366, Madison, Wisconsin 53708, or by email at [e-mail] .

Analysis Prepared by the Department of Safety and Professional Services

Statutes interpreted

Sections 441.04 , 441.05 , 441.06 , 441.08 , and 441.10 , Wis. Stats.

Statutory authority

Sections 15.08 (5) (b) and 441.01 (3) , Wis. Stats.

Explanation of agency authority

The board shall promulgate rules for its own guidance and for the guidance of the profession and define and enforce professional conduct and unethical practices not inconsistent with the law relating to the profession.

Specifically, the board may also establish rules to prevent unauthorized persons from practicing professional nursing. It shall approve all rules for the administration of ch. 441 , Wis. Stats.

Related statute or rule

Sections 441.04 , 441.05 , 441.06 , 441.08 and 441.10 , Wis. Stats.

Plain language analysis

This proposed rule updates the licensure process.

Section 1 repeals and recreates ch. N 2 . The first subsection is licensure by examination. The qualifications for professional nurse licensure are graduating from a high school or equivalent, does not have an arrest or conviction record related to the practice of nursing, graduated from a school of nursing and passes the NCLEX exam. The qualifications for practical nurse licensure are 2 years of high school, does not have an arrest or conviction record related to the practice of nursing, graduated from a school of nursing and passes the NCLEX exam. The application procedure is submitting an application, paying the fee, submitting proof of graduation, passing the NCLEX, and submitting all relevant information relating to criminal charges, convictions of crimes or any acts which would constitute unprofessional conduct. If the nurse is a graduate from a U.S. territory or outside the United States, the education credentials need to be evaluated by the Commission on Graduates of Foreign Nursing Schools.

The second subsection is licensure by endorsement. An applicant holding a current license from a compact state shall submit a completed application, pay the fee, declare Wisconsin as the primary state, and submit all relevant information relating to criminal charges, convictions of crimes, any acts which would constitute unprofessional conduct or discipline taken by another state. An applicant holding a current license from another U.S. state, territory or Canada shall submit evidence of initial licensure including graduation from an approved nursing school and passage of the NCLEX or evidence of educational qualifications and licensure examination. In addition, a applicant shall submit a completed application, pay the fee, verification from the state of initial licensure and current licensure, documentation of employment history, and submitting all relevant information relating to criminal charges, convictions of crimes, any acts which would constitute unprofessional conduct or discipline taken by another state. An applicant who does not have current nursing education or been employed in a position that requires a nursing license may apply for a limited license to complete a nurse refresher course.

The third subsection is temporary permits. A nurse who has graduated from an approved or comparable school may apply for a temporary permit upon submission of a completed application, payment of fee and verification of graduation from a nursing school. A graduate nurse may use the title of G.N. for graduate nurse or G.P.N. for graduate practical nurse. The holder of a temporary permit may only work under direct supervision unless the person holds a nursing license in another state. The temporary permit is valid for a period of three months or the receipt of results indicating failing the NCLEX. A temporary permit may be renewed once and may be renewed subsequently on the basis of hardship. A temporary permit may be denied or revoked for providing false information on the application, misrepresentation of title without a valid permit or for unprofessional conduct.

Section 2 repeals and recreates chapter N 3. The examining councils serve the Board in an advisory capacity. The section states the appointment process and composition of the two nursing examining councils.

Summary of, and comparison with, existing or proposed federal regulation

None

Comparison with rules in adjacent states

Illinois: In Illinois an applicant is eligible for nurse licensure by examination if the applicant completes an application, pays the fee, submits to a criminal background check and graduates from an approved school. If educated outside of the United States, the education is to be evaluated by the Commission on Graduates of Foreign Nursing Schools. A nurse is eligible for licensure if the applicant completes and application, pays the fee, submits to a criminal background check, graduates from an approved school, submits verification of licensure status from the jurisdiction of original licensure, the current state of licensure and all states the applicant has directly practiced in within the last 5 years. If educated outside of the United States, the education is to be evaluated by the Commission on Graduates of Foreign Nursing Schools.

Iowa: In Iowa an applicant is eligible for nurse licensure by examination if the applicant graduated from high school or the equivalent, completes an application, pays the fee, graduated from an approved program and passes NCLEX. If the person has a criminal conviction history or prior disciplinary action, the applicant must receive Board approval. If educated outside of the United States, the education is to be evaluated by the Commission on Graduates of Foreign Nursing Schools. A nurse from a compact state shall submit a completed application, pay the fee, declare Iowa as the primary state. A nurse is eligible for licensure by endorsement from a non-compact state if the applicant completes an application, pays a fee, has verification of original licensure and nursing program transcripts and submits a criminal background check. If educated outside of the United States, the education is to be evaluated by the Commission on Graduates of Foreign Nursing Schools. If the person has a criminal conviction history or prior disciplinary action, the applicant must receive Board approval.

Michigan: In Michigan an applicant is eligible for nurse licensure by examination if the applicant completed an application, pays the fees, completed approved nursing education program and passes NCLEX. If educated outside of the United States, the education is to be evaluated by the Commission on Graduates of Foreign Nursing Schools. A nurse is eligible for licensure by endorsement if the applicant completes an application, pays the fee, graduated from an approved school of nursing and was first licensed in another state pursuant to passage of NCLEX.

Minnesota: In Minnesota a nurse is eligible for licensure by examination if the applicant completes an application, pays the fee, graduated from an approved school and passes NCLEX. If educated outside of the United States, the education is to be evaluated by the Commission on Graduates of Foreign Nursing Schools. A nurse is eligible for licensure by endorsement if the applicant completes an application, pays the fee, shows verification of licensure in another jurisdiction, has passed an examination acceptable to the board and answers questions related to any prior disciplinary actions. If the applicant has not engaged in acceptable nursing practice within the 2 years of application, the applicant must complete one contact hour of continuing education for each month that the applicant was not engaged in acceptable practice for a maximum of 60 hours and if the person has not practiced for more than 5 years, the applicant must compete a nurse refresher course. Minnesota does issue privilege to practice nursing in Minnesota licenses to border state applicants upon meeting certain requirements.

Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies

The Board reviewed the National Council of State Board of Nursing's model rules and the licensing requirements in our neighboring states.

Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small business or in preparation of economic impact analysis

The rule was posted for economic comments for a period of 14 days and none were received. This rule is related to an individual's eligibility for licensure and does not effect small business.

Fiscal Estimate and Economic Impact Analysis

The Fiscal Estimate and Economic Impact Analysis is attached.

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis or Summary

These proposed rules do not have an economic impact on small businesses, as defined in s. 227.114 (1) , Stats.

Agency Contact Person

Sharon Henes, Administrative Rules Coordinator, Department of Safety and Professional Services, Division of Board Services, 1400 East Washington Avenue, Room 151, P.O. Box 8366, Madison, Wisconsin 53708; telephone [phone]; email at [e-mail] .

STATE OF WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION DOA-2049 (R03/2012)	Division of Executive Budget and Finance 101 East Wilson Street, 10th Floor P.O. Box 7864 Madison, WI 53707-7864 FAX: [phone]
ADMINISTRATIVE RULES Fiscal Estimate & Economic Impact Analysis

1. Type of Estimate and Analysis
X Original   ⍽ Updated   ⍽ Corrected
2. Administrative Rule Chapter, Title and Number
N 2, 3
3. Subject
Nurse Licensure
4. Fund Sources Affected			5. Chapter 20, Stats. Appropriations Affected
⍽ GPR   ⍽ FED   X PRO   ⍽ PRS   ⍽ SEG   ⍽ SEG-S			20.165(1)(g)
6. Fiscal Effect of Implementing the Rule
⍽ No Fiscal Effect ⍽ Indeterminate	⍽ Increase Existing Revenues ⍽ Decrease Existing Revenues		X Increase Costs X Could Absorb Within Agency's Budget ⍽ Decrease Cost
7. The Rule Will Impact the Following (Check All That Apply)
⍽ State's Economy ⍽ Local Government Units		⍽ Specific Businesses/Sectors ⍽ Public Utility Rate Payers ⍽ Small Businesses (if checked, complete Attachment A)
8. Would Implementation and Compliance Costs Be Greater Than $20 million? ⍽ Yes   X No
9. Policy Problem Addressed by the Rule
This rule updates and creates clarity regarding the process of obtaining a nurse license. There has not been a review of these chapters since 1984.
10. Summary of the businesses, business sectors, associations representing business, local governmental units, and individuals that may be affected by the proposed rule that were contacted for comments.
This rule was posted for economic comments for a period of 14 days and no comments were received.
11. Identify the local governmental units that participated in the development of this EIA.
None.
12. Summary of Rule's Economic and Fiscal Impact on Specific Businesses, Business Sectors, Public Utility Rate Payers, Local Governmental Units and the State's Economy as a Whole (Include Implementation and Compliance Costs Expected to be Incurred)
None.
13. Benefits of Implementing the Rule and Alternative(s) to Implementing the Rule
The benefit is to create clarity and bring the process in line with current technologies.
14. Long Range Implications of Implementing the Rule
The long range implication is an updated licensure procedure.
15. Compare With Approaches Being Used by Federal Government
None
16. Compare With Approaches Being Used by Neighboring States (Illinois, Iowa, Michigan and Minnesota )
Our neighboring states require graduation from an approved school and passage of the NCLEX. Both Illinois and Iowa require fingerprint criminal background checks. All of the neighboring states require a person educated outside of the U.S. to have their education evaluated by the Commission on Graduates of Foreign Nursing Schools. The endorsement requirements of our neighboring states include verification of licensure in the other jurisdiction(s) and consideration of past disciplinary actions. Illinois and Iowa require fingerprint criminal background checks. Minnesota requires nursing practice within 2 years of the application.
17. Contact Name				18. Contact Phone Number
Sharon Henes				[phone]

This document can be made available in alternate formats to individuals with disabilities upon request.

Notice of Hearing

Safety and Professional Services —
Board of Nursing

CR 14-004

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to authority vested in the Board of Nursing in ss.15.08 (5) (b) and 441.01 (3), Wis. Stats., and interpreting ss. 441.01 (3) and (4) and 441.12 , Wis. Stats., the Board of Nursing will hold a public hearing at the time and place indicated below to consider an order to repeal and recreate Chapter N 1 , relating to school approval.

Hearing Information

Date:   Thursday, February 13, 2014
Time:   8:00 a.m.
Location:   1400 East Washington Avenue
  Room 121A
  Madison, Wisconsin

Appearances at the Hearing

Interested persons are invited to present information at the hearing. Persons appearing may make an oral presentation but are urged to submit facts, opinions and argument in writing as well. Facts, opinions and argument may also be submitted in writing without a personal appearance by mail addressed to the Department of Safety and Professional Services, Division of Policy Development, P.O. Box 8366, Madison, Wisconsin 53708. Written comments must be received at or before the public hearing to be included in the record of rule-making proceedings.

Place where Comments are to be Submitted and Deadline for Submission

Comments may be submitted to Sharon Henes, Administrative Rules Coordinator, Department of Safety and Professional Services, Division of Board Services, 1400 East Washington Avenue, Room 151, P.O. Box 8366, Madison, WI 53708-8935, or by email to [e-mail] . Comments must be received at or before the public hearing to be held on February 13, 2014 to be included in the record of rule-making proceedings.

Copies of Rule

Copies of this proposed rule are available upon request to Sharon Henes, Administrative Rules Coordinator, Department of Safety and Professional Services, Division of Board Services, 1400 East Washington Avenue, P.O. Box 8366, Madison, Wisconsin 53708, or by email at [e-mail] .

Analysis prepared by the Department of Safety and Professional Services

Statutes interpreted

Sections 441.01 (3) and (4) and 441.12 , Wis. Stats.

Statutory authority

Sections 15.08 (5) (b) and 441.01 (3) , Wis. Stats.

Explanation of agency authority

The board shall promulgate rules for its own guidance and for the guidance of the profession to which it pertains.

Specifically, the board may establish minimum standards for schools for professional nurses and schools for licensed practical nurses, including all related clinical units and facilities, and make and provide periodic surveys and consultations to such schools. It may also establish rules to prevent unauthorized persons from practicing professional nursing. It shall approve all rules for the administration of chapter 441, Wis. Stats.

Related statute or rule

Sections 441.01 (3) and (4) and 441.12 , Wis. Stats.

Plain language analysis

The proposed rule repeals and recreates the nursing school approval process chapter. The chapter has not been updated since 1989 and the school approval process has evolved since that time.

There are three stages to the approval process. The first stage is the authorization to plan a school of nursing. The institution will provide to the board the name and address of the controlling institution, accreditation status, statement of intent including the academic and licensure levels; evidence of the availability of clinical facilities, plan to recruit an educational administrator and faculty and the proposed timeline. The board will review the application and make a decision within two months of the completed application. The second stage is the authorization to admit students. The school of nursing will provide to the board verification of employment of an educational administrator, evidence of faculty, the school's philosophy and objectives, an overview of the curriculum, verification of student policies, the ability for the students to acquire clinical skills and an updated timeline. The board will review the materials and make a decision with two months. The last stage is approval of the school of nursing. A school may apply for approval upon graduation of the first class, but no later than graduation of the third class (class is defined as a 12 month period). The board may conduct a site survey. The decision on the application will occur within two months of the completed site survey or the completed application whichever is later. The board may grant approval, conditional approval or deny approval. If the board grants conditional approval, the board will state the basis and the school of nursing may not admit any new students into the school until the board meets the standard and receives full approval. If the school of nursing is denied approval, the school will receive a notice of denial and will take steps to close the school. The school may request a hearing and the closure of the school may be postponed during the appeals process.

Out of state schools operating in the state of Wisconsin will be approve and continual to be approved if the school is approved by the board of the state where the school is located and the school has approved nursing accreditation.

A school of nursing must receive national nursing accreditation within 3 years of school approval and all schools which already have approval as of July 1, 2014, must have accreditation by July 1, 2017. Failure to maintain nursing accreditation will result in loss of school approval.

School of nursing standards include:

•   The institution shall have legal responsibility for overall conduct of the school of nursing.

•   The educational administrator will have a license or privilege to practice nursing in Wisconsin, a graduate degree with a major in nursing, knowledge of learning principles for adult education or 2 years experience as an instructor in a nursing education program within the last 5 years and current knowledge of nursing practice.

•   Faculty will have a license or privilege to practice nursing in Wisconsin. Professional nursing faculty members will have a graduate degree with a major in nursing; practical nursing faculty members will have a baccalaureate degree with a major in nursing.

•   If a school of nursing is unable to have faculty whom meeting the standards, the school may apply to the board for a faculty exception.

•   Curriculum will enable to student to develop the knowledge, skills and abilities necessary for competent nursing practice expected at the level of licensure. It will be revised as necessary to reflect advances in health care and its delivery.

•   There will be clinical learning experiences in a variety of clinical or simulated settings.

•   Preceptors will be approved by the faculty of the school of nursing and have clear roles and responsibilities. The preceptors will have an unencumbered license or privilege to practice in Wisconsin.

•   The school of nursing will implement a plan for ongoing evaluation.

The national council licensure exam (NCLEX) pass rate standards for the school is one of the following

•   A minimum of 80% of first time test takers within 6 months of graduation

•   A minimum of 80% of all students taking the NCLEX and a plan to meet the first time test taker standard.

Failure to meet the standard will result in a warning letter and school of nursing to submit an institutional plan for improvement of the NCLEX pass rate. The school of nursing will submit progress reports until the standard is met.

A school of nursing will submit annual self-evaluation reports, all documents submitted to or received from nursing accreditation agencies and notify the board if there is a change in accreditation status. Failure to maintain nursing accreditation will result in loss of school approval. The board may review the school of nursing to determine whether the standards are being met in the following situations:

•   Change in accreditation status

•   Nursing accreditation reports indicate accreditation standards are not being met

•   Complaints received regarding the school

•   Failure to meet NCLEX pass rate standard for more than 2 consecutive years

•   Violation of any rules under this chapter.

The review of the school may include a site survey, self-study report or a progress report. If standards are not being met, the school of nursing shall submit a plan and progress reports as requested. The board may withdraw board approval if the school continues to not meet standards.

Closure of a school of nursing involves providing a placement for students and indicating where the academic records and transcripts will be stored and how access to those records will be maintained.

Nurse refresher courses are designed for nurses who have been out of practice for more than five years. The course will contain theory, skills labs and clinical experience. The board will review nurse the curriculum for inclusion on a listing of approved courses. The student who participates in a non-approved course may submit curriculum for approval.

Summary of, and comparison with, existing or proposed federal regulation

None

Comparison with rules in adjacent states

Illinois: Illinois program approval process includes: a letter of intent, a feasibility study, hiring of a nurse administrator, submission of a curriculum proposal, and a site survey. Continued approval is based upon annual evaluation reports, full routine site visits and maintaining a NCLEX pass rate of 75% of first time test takers. Major and minor curricular changes are reported to the board. Closure of the school involves responsibility for assisting students in transferring and notification of location of records storage. The standards for the school include institutional requirements, curriculum standards, clinical standards, nurse administrator and faculty qualifications (allows for variances to faculty standards) and student standards.

Iowa: Iowa program approval process includes: first step involves an application with information regarding the controlling institution and needs assessment; second step involves verification of employment of the head of program, submission of program's philosophy and objectives, curriculum plan, letter of intent from clinical facilities, evidence of provision of faculty, proposed budget and timeframe for implementation; next step is interim approval based upon program proposal and site visit; final approval is upon graduation of first class and NCLEX pass rate results. Provisional approval may be granted to program until standards are met. Change of controlling institution and changes in administrative personnel in the program. The program shall submit annual reports. Closure of the school involves responsibility for assisting students in transferring and notification of location of records storage. The standards for the school include institutional requirements, curriculum standards, clinical standards, nurse administrator and faculty qualifications, student standards and evaluation of the program. NCLEX pass rate standard is a minimum of 95% of the national passing percentage based upon first time test takers within 6 months of graduation.

Michigan: Michigan program approval process includes: the first step requires submission of a letter of intent, evidence of funding and other support, copy of Michigan Department of Career Development approval (if necessary), evidence of availability of clinical experiences, proposed number of students, proposed first date of admission, plans for recruiting director of the program and faculty and a site visit; initial approval involves a self-student report and annual progress reports; full approval is after the graduation of the 2 nd class, but no later than graduation of the 4 th class (a class for each 12 month period) and requires submission of a self-study report and a site visit. Every 4 years the school shall submit a self-study report and accredited schools shall follow the schedule of the accrediting agency. Program changes shall be submitted to the board. Closure of the school involves responsibility for assisting students in transferring and notification of location of records storage. The standards for the school include institutional requirements, curriculum standards, clinical standards, nurse administrator and faculty qualifications (allows for variances to faculty standards), student standards, and evaluation of the program. NCLEX pass rate standard is 75% of first time test takers.

Minnesota: Minnesota program approval process includes: Phase 1 requires letter of intent including institution information, timetable for development and implementation, documentation of availability of academic facilities, impact on nursing programs in the area; Phase II involves a site visit and documentation of compliance with educational standards in order to be granted initial approval; Phase III is full approval and continual approval based upon meeting the minimum first time NCLEX success rate and acquiring national nursing education accreditation. Minnesota requires surveys of all schools on a periodic basis to maintain approval. NCLEX pass rate standard is 75% of first time test takers. All schools must be accredited by 2016. Annual reports shall be submitted to the Board. Closure of the school involves responsibility for assisting students in transferring and notification of location of records storage. The standards for the school include institutional requirements, clinical standards, nurse administrator and faculty qualifications, student standards, and evaluation of the program. The curriculum standard is the program must provide diverse learning activities that are consistent with program outcomes. Minnesota has an approval process for schools applying for innovative approaches which may require exemption from certain rules.

Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies

The Board considered the National Council of State Boards of Nursing's model practice rules and the rules and processes of our neighboring states.

Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small business or in preparation of economic impact analysis

The rule was posted for 14 days for economic impact comments and none were received.

Fiscal Estimate and Economic Impact Analysis

The Fiscal Estimate and Economic Impact Analysis is attached.

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis or Summary

These proposed rules do not have an economic impact on small businesses, as defined in s. 227.114 (1) , Stats.

Agency Contact Person

Sharon Henes, Administrative Rules Coordinator, Department of Safety and Professional Services, Division of Board Services, 1400 East Washington Avenue, Room 151, P.O. Box 8366, Madison, Wisconsin 53708; telephone [phone]; email at Sharon.Henes@wisconsin .gov .

STATE OF WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION DOA-2049 (R03/2012)	Division of Executive Budget and Finance 101 East Wilson Street, 10th Floor P.O. Box 7864 Madison, WI 53707-7864 FAX: [phone]
ADMINISTRATIVE RULES Fiscal Estimate & Economic Impact Analysis

1. Type of Estimate and Analysis
X Original   ⍽ Updated   ⍽ Corrected
2. Administrative Rule Chapter, Title and Number
N 1
3. Subject
School of Nursing Approval
4. Fund Sources Affected			5. Chapter 20, Stats. Appropriations Affected
⍽ GPR   ⍽ FED   ⍽ PRO   ⍽ PRS   ⍽ SEG   ⍽ SEG-S			20.165(1)(g)
6. Fiscal Effect of Implementing the Rule
⍽ No Fiscal Effect ⍽ Indeterminate	⍽ Increase Existing Revenues ⍽ Decrease Existing Revenues		X Increase Costs X Could Absorb Within Agency's Budget ⍽ Decrease Cost
7. The Rule Will Impact the Following (Check All That Apply)
⍽ State's Economy ⍽ Local Government Units		⍽ Specific Businesses/Sectors ⍽ Public Utility Rate Payers ⍽ Small Businesses (if checked, complete Attachment A)
8. Would Implementation and Compliance Costs Be Greater Than $20 million? ⍽ Yes   ⍽ No
9. Policy Problem Addressed by the Rule
This rule updates the school of nursing approval process. The current rules have been in place since 1985 and are not adequately addressing the changes in education.
10. Summary of the businesses, business sectors, associations representing business, local governmental units, and individuals that may be affected by the proposed rule that were contacted for comments.
This rule was posted for economic comments for a period of 14 days and no comments were received.
11. Identify the local governmental units that participated in the development of this EIA.
None
12. Summary of Rule's Economic and Fiscal Impact on Specific Businesses, Business Sectors, Public Utility Rate Payers, Local Governmental Units and the State's Economy as a Whole (Include Implementation and Compliance Costs Expected to be Incurred)
This rule will not have an economic or fiscal impact on specific businesses, business sectors, public utility rate payers, local governmental units or the state's economy as a whole.
13. Benefits of Implementing the Rule and Alternative(s) to Implementing the Rule
The benefit is to provide clarity and updates to the school of nursing approval process. The proposed rules also decrease the duplication between approval and national nursing school accreditation.
14. Long Range Implications of Implementing the Rule
The benefit is to provide clarity and updates to the school of nursing approval process. The proposed rules also decrease the duplication between approval and national nursing school accreditation.
15. Compare With Approaches Being Used by Federal Government
None
16. Compare With Approaches Being Used by Neighboring States (Illinois, Iowa, Michigan and Minnesota )
Illinois: Illinois program approval process includes: a letter of intent, a feasibility study, hiring of a nurse administrator, submission of a curriculum proposal, and a site survey. Continued approval is based upon annual evaluation reports, full routine site visits and maintaining a NCLEX pass rate of 75% of first time test takers. Major and minor curricular changes are reported to the board. Closure of the school involves responsibility for assisting students in transferring and notification of location of records storage. The standards for the school include institutional requirements, curriculum standards, clinical standards, nurse administrator and faculty qualifications (allows for variances to faculty standards) and student standards.
Iowa: Iowa program approval process includes: first step involves an application with information regarding the controlling institution and needs assessment; second step involves verification of employment of the head of program, submission of program's philosophy and objectives, curriculum plan, letter of intent from clinical facilities, evidence of provision of faculty, proposed budget and timeframe for implementation; next step is interim approval based upon program proposal and site visit; final approval is upon graduation of first class and NCLEX pass rate results. Provisional approval may be granted to program until standards are met. Change of controlling institution and changes in administrative personnel in the program. The program shall submit annual reports. Closure of the school involves responsibility for assisting students in transferring and notification of location of records storage. The standards for the school include institutional requirements, curriculum standards, clinical standards, nurse administrator and faculty qualifications, student standards and evaluation of the program. NCLEX pass rate standard is a minimum of 95% of the national passing percentage based upon first time test takers within 6 months of graduation. Michigan: Michigan program approval process includes: the first step requires submission of a letter of intent, evidence of funding and other support, copy of Michigan Department of Career Development approval (if necessary), evidence of availability of clinical experiences, proposed number of students, proposed first date of admission, plans for recruiting director of the program and faculty and a site visit; initial approval involves a self-student report and annual progress reports; full approval is after the graduation of the 2 nd class, but no later than graduation of the 4 th class (a class for each 12 month period) and requires submission of a self-study report and a site visit. Every 4 years the school shall submit a self-study report and accredited schools shall follow the schedule of the accrediting agency. Program changes shall be submitted to the board. Closure of the school involves responsibility for assisting students in transferring and notification of location of records storage. The standards for the school include institutional requirements, curriculum standards, clinical standards, nurse administrator and faculty qualifications (allows for variances to faculty standards), student standards, and evaluation of the program. NCLEX pass rate standard is 75% of first time test takers Minnesota: Minnesota program approval process includes: Phase 1 requires letter of intent including institution information, timetable for development and implementation, documentation of availability of academic facilities, impact on nursing programs in the area; Phase II involves a site visit and documentation of compliance with educational standards in order to be granted initial approval; Phase III is full approval and continual approval based upon meeting the minimum first time NCLEX success rate and acquiring national nursing education accreditation. Minnesota requires surveys of all schools on a periodic basis to maintain approval. NCLEX pass rate standard is 75% of first time test takers. All schools must be accredited by 2016. Annual reports shall be submitted to the Board. Closure of the school involves responsibility for assisting students in transferring and notification of location of records storage. The standards for the school include institutional requirements, clinical standards, nurse administrator and faculty qualifications, student standards, and evaluation of the program. The curriculum standard is the program must provide diverse learning activities that are consistent with program outcomes. Minnesota has an approval process for schools applying for innovative approaches which may require exemption from certain rules.
17. Contact Name				18. Contact Phone Number
Sharon Henes				[phone]

This document can be made available in alternate formats to individuals with disabilities upon request.

Notice of Hearing

Safety and Professional Services —
Pharmacy Examining Board

CR 14-003

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to authority vested in the Pharmacy Examining Board in s.15.08 (5) (b), 450.19 (2), and 961.31, Wis. Stats., and interpreting s. 450.19 , Wis. Stats., the Pharmacy Examining Board will hold a public hearing at the time and place indicated below to consider an order to repeal sections Phar 18.04 (3) (intro) , 18.04 (3) (k) , 18.11 (3) , 18.11 (4) , 18.11 (9) (a) , 18.11 (9) (b) , and 18.11 (9) (c) ; to renumber and amend section Phar 18.04 (2) ; to amend sections Phar 18.02 (8) (a) , 18.02 (9) , 18.02 (15) (intro) , 18.02 (17) , 18.04 (title), 18.04 (3) (L) , 18.04 (3) (m) , 18.04 (3) (n) , 18.04 (4) , 18.05 (1) , (1) (note) , (2) (note) , (3) (b) (note) , and (4) , 18.06 (2) , (3) (b) (note) , (6) (b) (note) , and (8) , 18.07 , 18.08 (1) (a) and (b) (note) , 18.09 , 18.10 (1) (intro) , (2) (intro.) and (b) , (3) , (6) , and (7) , 18.11 (6) (intro) and (10) (c) (note) , 18.12 (4) , and 18.14 (1) (intro) ; and to create sections Phar 18.02 (11m) , (15g) , and (15r) , 18.04 (2) (gg) and (gr) , relating to the prescription drug monitoring program.

Hearing Information

Date:   Wednesday, February 12, 2014
Time:   9:00 a.m.
Location:   1400 East Washington Avenue
  Room 121A
  Madison, Wisconsin

Appearances at the Hearing

Interested persons are invited to present information at the hearing. Persons appearing may make an oral presentation but are urged to submit facts, opinions and argument in writing as well. Facts, opinions and argument may also be submitted in writing without a personal appearance by mail addressed to the Department of Safety and Professional Services, Division of Policy Development, P.O. Box 8366, Madison, Wisconsin 53708. Written comments must be received at or before the public hearing to be included in the record of rule-making proceedings.

Place where Comments are to be Submitted and Deadline for Submission

Comments may be submitted to Sharon Henes, Administrative Rules Coordinator, Department of Safety and Professional Services, Division of Board Services, 1400 East Washington Avenue, Room 151, P.O. Box 8366, Madison, WI 53708-8935, or by email to [e-mail] . Comments must be received at or before the public hearing to be held on February 12, 2014 to be included in the record of rule-making proceedings.

Copies of Rule

Copies of this proposed rule are available upon request to Sharon Henes, Administrative Rules Coordinator, Department of Safety and Professional Services, Division of Board Services, 1400 East Washington Avenue, P.O. Box 8366, Madison, Wisconsin 53708, or by email at [e-mail] .

Analysis prepared by the Department of Safety and Professional Services

Statutes interpreted

Section 450.19 , Wis. Stats.

Statutory authority

Sections 15.08 (5) (b) , 450.19 (2) , and 961.31 , Wis. Stats.

Explanation of agency authority

The board has authority to promulgate rules for the guidance of the profession and to interpret the provisions of the statutes it enforces. The board also has authority to promulgate rules relating to the manufacture, distribution and dispensing of controlled substances within Wisconsin.

Specifically, the legislature directs the board to establish to govern the prescription drug monitoring program.

Related statute or rule

Section 450.19 , Wis. Stats. and ch. Phar 18 , Wis. Admin. Code.

Plain language analysis

This proposed rule modifies the ch. Phar 18 to improve the efficiency of the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) by ensuring consistency between the language of the rule and how PDMP functions.

Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 clarify and simplify definitions. A dispenser is a pharmacy. Dispenser delegate is a managing pharmacist or an agent or employee of a practitioner who has the delegated responsibility for data compilation and submission to PDMP. Managing pharmacist, pharmacist and practitioner definitions are identical to definitions in the statutes. Pharmacist delegate is an agent of a pharmacist who has been delegated access to PDMP information.

Section 7 clarifies the title of s. Phar 18.04 to "compilation of dispensing data".

Section 8 changes the "he or she" to dispenser. It also becomes an introduction paragraph to the items currently listed under s. Phar 18.04 (3) (intro) .

Section 9 repeals the introduction section. Therefore all of the times currently listed under it are now under new introduction paragraph created by Section 8.

Section 10, 11, 12 amends the dispensing data. The classification codes for payment type and refill number are added. The quantity prescribed is no longer required data. There is clarification of how to record an animal patient's name, address and birthdate.

Sections 13, 17, and 21 adds dispenser delegate as subject to discipline for failing to compile required dispensing data.

Section 14 clarifies the rule that unless exempt, a dispenser shall electronically submit data.

Sections 15, 16 , 19, 20, 24, and 35 update the P.O. Box number for the Department in all the notes in ch. Phar 18 which reference the Department's address.

Section 18 clarifies that the dispenser shall submit a zero report for each 7 day period which the dispenser did not dispense a monitored prescription drug.

Section 22 clarifies if incorrect dispensing data had been submitted, the dispenser shall submit the correct information within 7 days.

Section 23 removes the "he or she" reference and inserts "dispenser".

Sections 25, 26, 27, 29, and 30 remove "dispenser" and "dispenser delegate" throughout ss. Phar 18.09 and 18.10 (1) (intro) , (2) (b) , (3) , (6) , and (7) and replace with the terms "pharmacist" and "pharmacist delegate".

Section 28 requires a specific statute or rule to be given when requesting a review.

Section 31 repeals the requirement for board to disclose PDMP information to staff of a relevant agency in another state who are authorized to access confidential patient health care records under ss. 146.82 and 450.19 , Stats. It also repeals the requirement to disclose minimum amount of PDMP information necessary to health care facility staff committees or accreditation or health care services review organizations.

Section 32 adds that the board will disclose the minimum amount of PDMP information necessary to staff who are investigating pharmacists and pharmacist delegates.

Section 33 clarifies that the board may disclose de-identified PDMP information which does not identify any patient upon request.

Section 34 repeals the requirements for a researcher to obtain PDMP information.

Section 36 adds pharmacist and pharmacist delegate to the list of people which the board maintains a log for their access to PDMP information.

Section 37 clarifies relevant agencies in other jurisdictions with prescription drug monitoring programs by adding the word "state."

Summary of, and comparison with, existing or proposed federal regulation

None. Prescription drug monitoring programs are operated by the state jurisdictions.

Comparison with rules in adjacent states

Illinois: The statutes and administrative rules governing the Illinois Prescription Monitoring Program require dispensers to submit to a database similar information regarding the prescribing and dispensing of controlled substances. Dispensers are required to submit the method of payment the patient used for a prescription. See 720 Illinois Compiled Statutes 570/316-21 and Illinois Administrative Code Title 77, Chapter X, Subchapter e, Part 2080. Dispensers are not required to submit refill information.

Iowa: The statutes and administrative rules governing the Iowa Prescription Monitoring Program require dispensers to submit to a database similar information regarding the prescribing and dispensing of controlled substances. Dispensers are required to submit refill information and the method of payment the patient used for a prescription. See Iowa Code § 124.551 -58 and Iowa Administrative Code Title 657, Chapter 37 .

Michigan: The statutes, administrative rules, and requirements for the Michigan Automated Prescription System require dispensers to submit to a database similar information regarding the prescribing and dispensing of controlled substances. Dispensers are required to submit refill information and the method of payment the patient used for a prescription. See Michigan Public Health Code § 333.7333 and Michigan Administrative Code R. 338.471, and "List of Required Fields," Michigan Automated Prescription System (MAPS). See also http://www.michigan.gov/documents/lara/lara_MAPS_ASAP2009_ListofRequiredFields_365562_7.pdf , accessed on Dec. 17, 2013.

Minnesota: The statutes governing the Minnesota Prescription Monitoring Program require dispensers to submit to a database similar information regarding the prescribing and dispensing of controlled substances on a daily basis. Dispensers are not required to submit refill information or the method of payment the patient used for a prescription. See Minnesota Statute 152.126.

Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies

The Board received feedback while developing and deploying the prescription drug monitoring program and gained considerable expertise in ways to improve it once it became fully operational.

The Board is aware that currently there are some provisions which create inefficiencies and ambiguities that the PDMP has to overcome to be as effective of a tool to combat prescription drug misuse and abuse as it can be. This proposed rule corrects and updates those provisions.

All the modifications are based on feedback from stakeholders and the prescription drug monitoring program uses as well as other information obtained while developing and deploying the prescription drug monitoring program.

Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small business or in preparation of economic impact analysis

This rule was posted for economic impact comments for 14 days and none were received.

Fiscal Estimate and Economic Impact Analysis

The Fiscal Estimate and Economic Impact Analysis is attached.

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis or Summary

These proposed rules do not have an economic impact on small businesses, as defined in s. 227.114 (1) , Stats.

Agency Contact Person

Sharon Henes, Administrative Rules Coordinator, Department of Safety and Professional Services, Division of Board Services, 1400 East Washington Avenue, Room 151, P.O. Box 8366, Madison, Wisconsin 53708; telephone [phone]; email at [e-mail] .

STATE OF WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION DOA-2049 (R03/2012)	Division of Executive Budget and Finance 101 East Wilson Street, 10th Floor P.O. Box 7864 Madison, WI 53707-7864 FAX: [phone]
ADMINISTRATIVE RULES Fiscal Estimate & Economic Impact Analysis

1. Type of Estimate and Analysis
X Original   ⍽ Updated   ⍽ Corrected
2. Administrative Rule Chapter, Title and Number
Phar 18
3. Subject
Prescription Drug Monitoring Program updates
4. Fund Sources Affected			5. Chapter 20, Stats. Appropriations Affected
⍽ GPR   ⍽ FED   X PRO   ⍽ PRS   ⍽ SEG   ⍽ SEG-S			20.165(1)(g) and 20.165(1)(hg)
6. Fiscal Effect of Implementing the Rule
⍽ No Fiscal Effect ⍽ Indeterminate	⍽ Increase Existing Revenues ⍽ Decrease Existing Revenues		X Increase Costs X Could Absorb Within Agency's Budget ⍽ Decrease Cost
7. The Rule Will Impact the Following (Check All That Apply)
⍽ State's Economy ⍽ Local Government Units		⍽ Specific Businesses/Sectors ⍽ Public Utility Rate Payers ⍽ Small Businesses (if checked, complete Attachment A)
8. Would Implementation and Compliance Costs Be Greater Than $20 million? ⍽ Yes   X No
9. Policy Problem Addressed by the Rule
The Board is aware that currently there are provisions which create inefficiencies and ambiguities that the prescription drug monitoring program has to overcome to be as effective of a tool to combat prescription drug misuse and abuse as it can be. This proposed rule corrects and updates those provisions.
10. Summary of the businesses, business sectors, associations representing business, local governmental units, and individuals that may be affected by the proposed rule that were contacted for comments.
Economic impact comments were solicited by posting on Department and Administrative Rules websites for 14 days and no comments were received. Stakeholders had provided feedback during the implementation of changes which should be made to the current rules.
11. Identify the local governmental units that participated in the development of this EIA.
None
12. Summary of Rule's Economic and Fiscal Impact on Specific Businesses, Business Sectors, Public Utility Rate Payers, Local Governmental Units and the State's Economy as a Whole (Include Implementation and Compliance Costs Expected to be Incurred)
This rule will not have an economic or fiscal impact on specific businesses, business sectors, public utility rate payers, local governmental units or the state's economy as a whole.
13. Benefits of Implementing the Rule and Alternative(s) to Implementing the Rule
The Board received feedback while developing and deploying the prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) and gained considerable expertise in ways to improve it once it became fully operational. The benefit to implementing the rule is to make those changes. The alternative is to not make the modifications, which would not enable the Board to improve the PDMP based on information obtained while developing and deploying the PDMP and the feedback of stakeholders and PDMP users.
14. Long Range Implications of Implementing the Rule
The long range benefit is to have an effective prescription drug monitoring program.
15. Compare With Approaches Being Used by Federal Government
None
16. Compare With Approaches Being Used by Neighboring States (Illinois, Iowa, Michigan and Minnesota )
Our neighboring states require dispensers to submit to a database similar information regarding the prescribing and dispensing of controlled substances.
17. Contact Name				18. Contact Phone Number
Sharon Henes				[phone]

This document can be made available in alternate formats to individuals with disabilities upon request.