CR_13-115 Amends section PI 25.05 (1) (intro.), relating to the Children at Risk Plan and Program.

The federal counterpart to this rule is 40 CFR 136 . On May 18, 2012, EPA published as final rule, "Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants Under the Clean Water Act; Analysis and Sampling Procedures". The proposed revision to ch. NR 219 incorporates these changes and is consistent with the federal regulations.

Comparison of similar rules in adjacent states

The States of Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, and Minnesota have wastewater programs delegated to them from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Wisconsin has been the only state within EPA Region 5 which has allowed the use of SW-846 methods for NPDES compliance monitoring. Therefore, removing SW-846 methods from the rule will bring Wisconsin into line with other states.

With respect to new methods promulgated by the EPA, the Illinois EPA incorporated changes to 40 CFR Part 136 with legislation which took effect February 2013. The State of Michigan does not certify laboratories that perform analyses of wastewater. The Minnesota Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program incorporated the changes to 40 CFR Part 136 for its October 2013 application period. The Iowa Department of Natural Resources rules reference the 2007 edition of 40 CFR Part 136 at this time.

Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies

This proposed rule revision brings Wisconsin up to date with the current federal rules that establish analytical test methods.

Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small business or in preparation of an economic impact analysis

Alternate approved methods from different authoritative sources are available for all of the analytical methods that are being deleted. The quality control requirements for analyses are established in ch. NR 149 ; these will not change with updating methods tables. For several analyses, newer methods and techniques have been added. It is possible for a laboratory to change the analytical method it uses and not incur additional costs or, in some cases, actually reduce costs.

The requirements imposed upon small business include following approved analytical methods listed in the rule. There are no reporting requirements in ch. NR 219 . The small businesses that will likely be impacted by this rule are commercial laboratories certified under ch. NR 149 . The vast majority of these laboratories likely follow approved analytical methods that are being maintained in this chapter.

Effect on small business

The proposed changes to ch. NR 219 potentially only affect larger certified commercial laboratories and larger municipal wastewater facilities that analyze samples for compliance with their Wisconsin Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (WPDES) permit. There are 371 laboratories certified or registered to perform analyses by the department. Of these, 238 municipal wastewater laboratories, 48 industrial environmental, and 71 commercial environmental will be impacted by this rule. The remaining laboratories are public health laboratories that analyze drinking water and those that perform testing at hazardous waste facilities. This update will allow laboratories to utilize new techniques that currently require approval by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and deletes outdated methods that lack adequate quality control procedures.

Of the 371 certified or registered laboratories that will be impacted by this rule, there are less than 12, 3% of the total, that fit the definition of "small businesses". This proposed rule would affect commercial, industrial, and municipal laboratories that analyze effluent discharges to determine compliance with WPDES permit limitations. All laboratories performing analyses to determine WPDES compliance are expected to keep detailed records of all laboratory information, including: analytical methods and results, corrective action logs, equipment records, quality control records, and sample receipt logbooks.

This proposal does not change analytical testing requirements, nor does it address any change in reporting, schedule or deadline requirements. Sections 299.11 and 283.55 , Stats., do not allow for less stringent schedules, deadlines or reporting requirements. Laboratories may seek approval of an alternate test procedure, as specified in s. NR 219.05 , Wisc. Adm. Code, from U.S. EPA. WPDES permit terms and conditions and other related regulations require that permitted facilities conduct analytical tests in compliance with the procedures of ch. NR 219 . The Laboratory Certification and Registration Program audits laboratories performing these analyses to ensure that testing is performed in compliance with the proposed rule. If a laboratory does not follow an approved method, it is cited during the audit process; a laboratory must correct all identified deficiencies to maintain their certification under ch. NR 149 .

The Small Business Regulatory Coordinator may be contacted at [e-mail] , or by calling [phone].

Environmental Analysis

The Department has made a preliminary determination that adoption of the proposed rules would not involve significant adverse environmental effects and would not need an environmental analysis under ch. NR 150 , Wis. Adm. Code. However, based on comments received, an environmental analysis may be prepared before proceeding. This analysis would summarize the Department's consideration of the impacts of the proposal and any reasonable alternatives.

Fiscal Estimate Summary

This rule will have no fiscal effect on state government. Minimal economic impact associated with this rule revision is anticipated for local governments and the private sector. The majority of the costs are upfront costs resulting from labs having to change SOPs and from validating the new EPA methods. Even the minimal fiscal impact is unavoidable as this rule revision is being directed by the U.S. EPA.

Contact Person

Richard Mealy

Department of Natural Resources

Bureau of Science Services SS/7

101 S Webster St, Madison, WI 53703

Phone: [phone]

Fax: [phone]

E-mail: [e-mail]

STATE OF WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION DOA-2049 (R03/2012)	Division of Executive Budget and Finance 101 East Wilson Street, 10th Floor P.O. Box 7864 Madison, WI 53707-7864 FAX: [phone]
ADMINISTRATIVE RULES Fiscal Estimate & Economic Impact Analysis

1. Type of Estimate and Analysis
X Original   ⍽ Updated   ⍽ Corrected
2. Administrative Rule Chapter, Title and Number
NR 219
3. Subject
Analytical test procedures and approved methods.
4. Fund Sources Affected			5. Chapter 20, Stats. Appropriations Affected
⍽ GPR   ⍽ FED   ⍽ PRO   ⍽ PRS   ⍽ SEG   ⍽ SEG-S
6. Fiscal Effect of Implementing the Rule
X

No Fiscal Effect

⍽ Indeterminate

⍽ Increase Existing Revenues

⍽ Decrease Existing Revenues

⍽ Increase Costs

⍽ Could Absorb Within Agency's Budget

⍽ Decrease Cost

7. The Rule Will Impact the Following (Check All That Apply)

⍽ State's Economy

X Local Government Units

X Specific Businesses/Sectors

⍽ Public Utility Rate Payers

⍽ Small Businesses (if checked, complete Attachment A)

8. Would Implementation and Compliance Costs Be Greater Than $20 million?

⍽ Yes   X No

9. Policy Problem Addressed by the Rule

Current wastewater analysis methods being used are not in compliance with EPA requirements. The EPA is requiring the WDNR to remove the SW 846 methods for wastewater analysis from the rule. SW 846 methods will still be included in NR 219 and allowed to be used for the analysis of sludge (currently Table EM). In addition, we will be adding methods the EPA has promulgated in the Method Update Rule (MUR) dated May 18, 2012.

10. Summary of the businesses, business sectors, associations representing business, local governmental units, and individuals that may be affected by the proposed rule that were contacted for comments.

Laboratories using SW 846 methods could potentially be affected. These include small businesses, businesses, and municipal wastewater treatment facilities (WWTF). In our preliminary research we conducted a survey of 57 labs that could potentially be using SW-846 methods.

We received 19 responses. Sixty-seven percent (thirteen respondents) anticipated no economic impact. Thirty-three percent (six respondents) anticipated some, but minimal economic impact.

11. Identify the local governmental units that participated in the development of this EIA.

See above.

12. Summary of Rule's Economic and Fiscal Impact on Specific Businesses, Business Sectors, Public Utility Rate Payers, Local Governmental Units and the State's Economy as a Whole (Include Implementation and Compliance Costs Expected to be Incurred)

We expect the economic and fiscal impact of this rule revision to be minimal. Those who responded to our survey reported costs ranging from $50 to $25,000. One lab did not provide a cost estimate. Four of the six respondents estimated costs less than $4,500.

To estimate the economic impact statewide, we assume (based on responses) that 30 percent of state labs will need to revise their methods.

The majority of the costs come from staff time spent revising SOPs and validating the new methods. Alternative methods are available online for free through the EPA. Methods are similar enough that laboratory equipment and supplies will likely be comparable in cost. Costs to laboratories will primarily be incurred from time spent validating new methods and revising SOPs.

A survey was sent out to 57 labs known or believed to perform wastewater testing using the methods scheduled to be removed. There were 19 respondents (33% response rate). Survey questions and responses are as follows:

1. Do you use any of the SW-846 methods listed in NR219 for WPDES monitoring?

•   Yes – 6 respondents

•   No – 13 respondents.

2. Which SW-846 methods do you use?

•   Respondents indicated an array of SW-846 methodologies, the majority of which were related to metals, volatile organics, and semivolatile organics.

3. Anticipated costs:

•   $50

•   $1,300

•   $2,000

•   $3,000-$4,500

•   $25,000 (Note: There is no substantiation or rationale for this figure)

•   Unknown

4. Lab equipment costs

•   None/minor costs

5. Any anticipated difficulties

•   Two said they would have to run both old and new methods which would be somewhat of a burden.

6. Other costs

•   Most say none; one respondent said $42,000/year resulting from running additional controls and standards. The elimination of SW-846 methods , however, will not result in any increased frequency for quality control samples or standards.

7. Respondent classification

•   Small business: 4

•   Business: 1

•   Municipality/WWTF: 1

In summary:

Minimal economic impact associated with this rule revision is anticipated. The majority of the costs are upfront costs resulting from labs having to change SOPs and from validating the new EPA methods. Even the minimal fiscal impact is unavoidable as this rule revision is being directed by the U.S. EPA.

13. Benefits of Implementing the Rule and Alternative(s) to Implementing the Rule

Wastewater analysis methods will be in compliance with EPA standards.

14. Long Range Implications of Implementing the Rule

The costs are primarily up-front implementation costs; therefore, there are very few long-range implications of implementing this rule beyond the WDNR being in compliance with EPA standards.

15. Compare With Approaches Being Used by Federal Government

These regulations are established by the U.S. EPA.

16. Compare With Approaches Being Used by Neighboring States (Illinois, Iowa, Michigan and Minnesota )

All the other U.S. EPA Region 5 states (Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota and Ohio) are subject to the U.S. EPA regulations that are delegated to the states for implementation. Wisconsin's rules for laboratory standards should essentially be the same as the other states.

17. Contact Name

18. Contact Phone Number

Richard Mealy

[phone]

This document can be made available in alternate formats to individuals with disabilities upon request.

Notice of Rulemaking Without Public Hearing

Public Instruction

CR 13-115

The State Superintendent of Public Instruction hereby proposes an order to amend section PI 25.05 (1) (intro) , relating to the Children at Risk Plan and Program.

The rules are being adopted under s. 227.16 (2) (b) , Stats., which provides that rulemaking does not need to be preceded by notice and public hearing if the proposed rule brings an existing rule into conformity with a statute that has been changed.

Place where Comments are to be Submitted and Deadline for Submission

Comments can be submitted to Katie Schumacher using the contact information below. Comments must be submitted no later than 10 days after publication of the notice of submittal to the Rules Clearinghouse in the Administrative Register.

Analysis by the Department of Public Instruction

Statute interpreted

Section 118.153 (3) (c) 2. , Stats.

Statutory authority

Section 118.153 (7) ., Stats.

Explanation of agency authority

Under s. 118.153 (7) , Stats., the State Superintendent must promulgate rules to implement the program for children at risk of not graduating from high school.

Related statute or rule

None.

Plain language analysis

The proposed rule change will modify s. PI 25.05 to align it with the statutory change made in 2011 Wisconsin Act 32 , which removed the statutory limitation on the number of children at risk a school district may contract with private agencies to provide services for.

Summary of, and comparison with, existing or proposed federal regulations

N/A.

Comparison with rules in adjacent states

N/A.

Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies

N/A.

Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small business or in preparation of economic impact report

N/A.

Anticipated Costs Incurred by Private Sector

N/A.

Effect on Small Business

The proposed rules will have no economic impact on small businesses, as defined in s. 227.114 (1) , Stats.

Agency Contact Person

Katie Schumacher

Budget and Policy Analyst

Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction

[e-mail]

[phone]

Text of Rule

SECTION 1. PI 25.05(1)(intro) is amended to read:

PI 25.05 (1) The board of a school district may contract with private, nonprofit, nonsectarian agencies to provide programs for children at risk for not more than 30% of the children at risk enrolled in grades 5 through 12, if the board determines that the agencies can adequately serve such children. A board contracting under this section shall take all of the following actions:

SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE:

The proposed rules contained in this order shall take effect on the first day of the month commencing after the date of publication in the Wisconsin Administrative Register, as provided in s. 227.22(2)(intro.) , Stats.

STATE OF WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION DOA 2049 (R 07/2011) ADMINISTRATIVE RULES FISCAL ESTIMATE AND ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Type of Estimate and Analysis
X Original ⍽ Updated ⍽ Corrected
Administrative Rule Chapter, Title and Number
PI 25, Children At Risk Plan and Program
Subject
Aligning the Rule with Statute
Fund Sources Affected			Chapter 20, Stats. Appropriations Affected
⍽ GPR ⍽ FED ⍽ PRO ⍽ PRS ⍽ SEG ⍽ SEG-S
Fiscal Effect of Implementing the Rule
X No Fiscal Effect ⍽ Indeterminate	⍽ Increase Existing Revenues ⍽ Decrease Existing Revenues		⍽ Increase Costs ⍽ Could Absorb Within Agency's Budget ⍽ Decrease Costs
The Rule Will Impact the Following (Check All That Apply)
⍽ State's Economy ⍽ Local Government Units		⍽ Specific Businesses/Sectors ⍽ Public Utility Rate Payers
Would Implementation and Compliance Costs Be Greater Than $20 million? ⍽ Yes X No
Policy Problem Addressed by the Rule
The proposed rule change will modify PI 25.05 to align it with the statutory change made in 2011 Wisconsin Act 32, which removed the statutory limitation on the number of children at risk a school district may contract with private agencies to provide services for.
Summary of Rule's Economic and Fiscal Impact on Specific Businesses, Business Sectors, Public Utility Rate Payers, Local Governmental Units and the State's Economy as a Whole (Include Implementation and Compliance Costs Expected to be Incurred)
Local: None. 2011 Wisconsin Act 32 removed the statutory limitation on the number of children at risk a school district may contract with private agencies to provide services for; revision of the rule to align it with statute will have no fiscal effect. State: No fiscal effect.
Benefits of Implementing the Rule and Alternative(s) to Implementing the Rule
The rule needs to be revised to align it with the statutory change made in 2011 Wisconsin Act 32. Otherwise, the rule will not reflect current law.
Long Range Implications of Implementing the Rule
This will help align PI 25 of the DPI Administrative Code with the Wisconsin Statutes.
Compare With Approaches Being Used by Federal Government
N/A.
Compare With Approaches Being Used by Neighboring States (Illinois, Iowa, Michigan and Minnesota )
N/A.
Name and Phone Number of Contact Person
Katie Schumacher, Department of Public Instruction Administrative Rules Coordinator, [phone].

Notice of Rulemaking Without Public Hearing

Public Instruction

CR 13-116

The State Superintendent of Public Instruction hereby proposes an order to repeal Chapter PI 42 , relating to the School Breakfast Program.

The rules are being adopted under s. 227.16 (2) (b) , Stats., which provides that rulemaking does not need to be preceded by notice and public hearing if the proposed rule brings an existing rule into conformity with a statute that has been changed.

Place where Comments are to be Submitted and Deadline for Submission

Comments can be submitted to Katie Schumacher using the contact information below. Comments must be submitted no later than 10 days after publication of the notice of submittal to the Rules Clearinghouse in the Administrative Register.

Analysis by the Department of Public Instruction

Statute interpreted

None. 1999 Wisconsin Act 9 eliminated the grants awarded under the School Breakfast Program.

Statutory authority

None.

Explanation of agency authority

The Department of Public Instruction is repealing a rule that no longer has any statutory authority.

Related statute or rule

None.

Plain language analysis

This proposed rule change is a technical change that would repeal a rule that no longer has any statutory authority.

Summary of, and comparison with, existing or proposed federal regulations

N/A.

Comparison with rules in adjacent states

Down

Down

/code/register/2014/697a/rulemaking_notices false register /code/register/2014/697a/rulemaking_notices/3/1 register/697/A/rulemaking_notices CR 13-115 register/697/A/rulemaking_notices CR 13-115 section true

• Menu
• » Administrative Rules Related
• » Administrative Register
• » 2014
• » 697A
• » Rulemaking Notices

× Details for
PDF view
Link (Permanent link)
Bookmark this location
View toggle
Go to top of document

---

Cross references for section
Acts affecting this section
References to this
1970 Statutes Annotations
Appellate Court Citations

---

Reference lines
Clear highlighting

Links to Admin. Code and Statutes in this Register are to current versions, which may not be the version that was referred to in the original published document.

N/A.

Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies

N/A.

Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small business or in preparation of economic impact report

N/A.

Anticipated Costs Incurred by Private Sector

N/A.

Effect on Small Business

The proposed rules will have no economic impact on small businesses, as defined in s. 227.114 (1) , Stats.

Agency Contact Person

Katie Schumacher

Budget and Policy Analyst

Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction

[e-mail]

[phone]

Text of Rule

SECTION 1. Chapter PI 42 is repealed.

SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE:

The proposed rules contained in this order shall take effect on the first day of the month commencing after the date of publication in the Wisconsin Administrative Register, as provided in s. 227.22(2)(intro.) , Stats.

STATE OF WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION DOA 2049 (R 07/2011) ADMINISTRATIVE RULES FISCAL ESTIMATE AND ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Type of Estimate and Analysis
X Original ⍽ Updated ⍽ Corrected
Administrative Rule Chapter, Title and Number
PI 42, School Breakfast Program
Subject
Repeal of PI 42
Fund Sources Affected			Chapter 20, Stats. Appropriations Affected
⍽ GPR ⍽ FED ⍽ PRO ⍽ PRS ⍽ SEG ⍽ SEG-S
Fiscal Effect of Implementing the Rule
X No Fiscal Effect ⍽ Indeterminate	⍽ Increase Existing Revenues ⍽ Decrease Existing Revenues		⍽ Increase Costs ⍽ Could Absorb Within Agency's Budget ⍽ Decrease Costs
The Rule Will Impact the Following (Check All That Apply)
⍽ State's Economy ⍽ Local Government Units		⍽ Specific Businesses/Sectors ⍽ Public Utility Rate Payers
Would Implementation and Compliance Costs Be Greater Than $20 million? Yes X No
Policy Problem Addressed by the Rule
There is no longer funding or statutory authority for School Breakfast Program grants. Thus, the rule needs to be repealed.
Summary of Rule's Economic and Fiscal Impact on Specific Businesses, Business Sectors, Public Utility Rate Payers, Local Governmental Units and the State's Economy as a Whole (Include Implementation and Compliance Costs Expected to be Incurred)
Local: None. Grants for School Breakfast Programs were eliminated in 2011 Act 32; repeal of the rule will have no fiscal effect. State: No fiscal effect.
Benefits of Implementing the Rule and Alternative(s) to Implementing the Rule
The rule needs to be repealed since there is no longer any statutory authority for the grant program. Otherwise, the rule will not reflect current law.
Long Range Implications of Implementing the Rule
Elimination of the rule will align the DPI Administrative Code with statutes.
Compare With Approaches Being Used by Federal Government
N/A.
Compare With Approaches Being Used by Neighboring States (Illinois, Iowa, Michigan and Minnesota )
N/A.
Name and Phone Number of Contact Person
Katie Schumacher, Department of Public Instruction Administrative Rules Coordinator, [phone].

Notice of Hearing

Revenue

EmR1323

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN That, pursuant to ss. 77.58 (5) , 77.65 (3) , and 227.11 (2) (a) , Stats., the Department of Revenue will hold a public hearing to consider emergency rules revising Chapter Tax 11 , relating to sales tax filing frequency.

Hearing Information

The hearing will be held:

Date:   Monday, January 27, 2014
Time:   1:00 p.m.
Location:   Events Room
  State Revenue Building
  2135 Rimrock Road
  Madison, WI 53713

Handicap access is available at the hearing location.

Appearances at the Hearing and Submittal of Written Comments

Interested persons are invited to appear at the hearing and may make an oral presentation. It is requested that written comments reflecting the oral presentation be given to the department at the hearing. Written comments may also be submitted to the contact person listed below or to adminrules.wisconsin.gov no later than January 27, 2014 , and will be given the same consideration as testimony presented at the hearing.

Place where Comments are to be Submitted and Deadline For Submission

Comments may be submitted to the contact person shown below no later than the date on which the public hearing on this rule is conducted.

Dale Kleven

Department of Revenue

Mail Stop 6-40

2135 Rimrock Road

P.O. Box 8933

Madison, WI 53708-8933

Telephone: [phone]

E-mail: [e-mail]

Analysis by the Department of Revenue

Statutes interpreted

Section 77.58 (1) (a) and (5) , Stats.

Statutory authority

Sections 77.58 (5) , 77.65 (3) , and 227.11 (2) (a) , Stats.

Explanation of agency authority

Section 77.58 (5) , Stats., provides "The department, if it deems it necessary to ensure payment to or facilitate the collection by the state of the amount of taxes, may require returns and payments of the amount of taxes for other than quarterly periods. The department may, if satisfied that the revenues will be adequately safeguarded, permit returns and payments of the amount of taxes for other than quarterly periods … "

Section 77.65 (3) , Stats., provides "[t]he department may promulgate rules to administer this section … "

Section 227.11 (2) (a) , Stats., provides "[e]ach agency may promulgate rules interpreting the provisions of any statute enforced or administered by the agency, if the agency considers it necessary to effectuate the purpose of the statute..."

Related statute or rule

There are no other applicable statutes or rules.

Plain language analysis

This proposed rule amends the reference in s. Tax 11.93 to increase the annual filing standard to $600 (currently $300) to allow more retailers to file sales tax returns annually. This is consistent with changes made to s. 77.58 (1) (a) , Stats., by 2013 Wis. Act 20 , to allow more retailers to file sales tax returns less frequently (quarterly rather than monthly).

Summary of, and comparison with, existing or proposed federal regulation

There is no existing or proposed federal regulation that is intended to address the activities to be regulated by the rule.

Comparison with rules in adjacent states

Illinois (86 ILL. Adm. Code 130.502), Iowa (Rule 701 12.1(422)), and Minnesota (Rule 8130.7300) also address sales tax filing frequency in their rules. As with Wisconsin, each of these state's rules are based on unique underlying statutes and policy. Because of this, a meaningful comparison cannot be made.

Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies

2013 Wis. Act 20 doubled the threshold upon which a monthly sales tax return is required to be filed ($600 to $1200). The department has created this proposed rule order to be consistent with this statutory change by doubling the threshold upon which an annual sales tax return may be filed ($300 to $600). No other data was used in the preparation of this rule order or this analysis.

Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small business

This rule order makes changes to reflect current law and current department policy. It makes no policy or other changes having an effect on small business.

Anticipated Costs Incurred by Private Sector

This rule does not have a fiscal effect on the private sector.

Effect on Small Business

This rule does not affect small business.

Agency Contact Person

Please contact Dale Kleven at [phone] or [e-mail] , if you have any questions regarding this rule.

Dale Kleven

Department of Revenue

Mail Stop 6-40

2135 Rimrock Road

P.O. Box 8933

Madison, WI 53708-8933

[e-mail] .

Finding of Emergency

The Department of Revenue finds that an emergency exists and that the attached rule order is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety or welfare. A statement of the facts constituting the emergency is:

Section 77.58 (1) , Stats., provides that retailers must file sales tax returns quarterly, except as provided in s. 77.58 (1) (a) and (b) , Stats., which allows for sales tax returns to be filed monthly.

Section 77.58 (5) , Stats., provides that the department may require returns and payments on the amount of taxes for other than a quarterly period if it deems it necessary to ensure payment to or facilitate the collection by the state of the amount of taxes. The department has provided for annual sales tax returns by rule in s. Tax 11.93 (1) for retailers that have an annual tax liability of $300 or less.

Section 77.58 (1) (a) , Stats., as amended by 2013 Wis. Act 20 , requires retailers to file sales tax returns monthly if their tax liability exceeds $1,200 in any quarter. This change goes into effect on January 1, 2014. Under prior law, retailers were required to file monthly sales tax returns if their tax liability exceeded $600 in any quarter.

Because 2013 Wis. Act 20 doubles the threshold upon which a monthly sales tax return is required to be filed ($600 to $1200), s. Tax 11.93 (1) should also be changed to reflect a similar increase in the threshold upon which an annual sales tax return can be filed.

As the statutory change to the monthly filing standard goes into effect on January 1, 2014, the corresponding change to the annual filing standard in s. Tax 11.93 (1) should also go into effect on January 1, 2014. There is insufficient time for the permanent rule to be effective on January 1, 2014.

Text of Rule

SECTION 1. Tax 11.93 (1) and (Note 2) are amended to read:

Tax 11.93 (1) A retailer holding a regular seller's permit who during the previous calendar or fiscal year had a sales and use tax liability not exceeding $300 $600 will be notified by the department that it must only file one sales and use tax return for the following year. If the retailer wants to continue to file returns on a quarterly basis, it must contact the department.

(Note 2) The interpretations in s. Tax 11.93 are effective under the general sales and use tax law on and after September 1, 1969, except: (a) The A $300 standard applies applied to taxable years beginning on and after January 1, 1979. Prior to that date, a $100 standard applied; and (b) The "annual information return" was eliminated for 1981 and subsequent years, pursuant to Chapter 221, Laws of 1979 . ; and (c) The $600 standard applies on and after January 1, 2014.

SECTION 2. Effective date. This rule shall take effect upon publication in the official state newspaper as provided in s. 227.22 (2) (c) , Stats.

FISCAL ESTIMATE FORM				2013 Session
X ORIGINAL ⍽ UPDATED	LRB #
	INTRODUCTION #
⍽ CORRECTED ⍽ SUPPLEMENTAL	Admin rule #		Tax 11: Sales Tax Filing Frequency
Subject Emergency Rule - Proposed order of the Department of Revenue relating to sales tax filing frequency
Fiscal Effect

State:   ⍽ No State Fiscal Effect   Check columns below only if bill makes a direct appropriation or affects a sum sufficient appropriation ⍽ Increase Existing Appropriation     ⍽ Increase Existing Revenues ⍽ Decrease Existing Appropriation     X Decrease Existing Revenues ⍽ Create New Appropriation			X Increase Costs - May be Possible to Absorb Within Agency's Budget X Yes ⍽ No   ⍽ Decrease Costs
Local: ⍽ No Local Government Costs
1. ⍽ Increase Costs	3. ⍽ Increase Revenues		5. Types of Local Governmental Units Affected:
⍽ Permissive ⍽ Mandatory	⍽ Permissive ⍽ Mandatory		⍽ Towns   ⍽ Villages   ⍽ Cities
2. ⍽ Decrease Costs	4. X Decrease Revenues		X Counties X Others	Stadium Districts
⍽ Permissive ⍽ Mandatory	⍽ Permissive X Mandatory		⍽ School Districts ⍽ WTCS Districts
Fund Sources Affected ⍽ GPR ⍽ FED ⍽ PRO ⍽ PRS ⍽ SEG ⍽ SEG-S		Affected Ch. 20 Appropriations

Assumptions Used in Arriving at Fiscal Estimate:

The proposed rule modifies Chapter TAX 11 of the Administrative Code regarding the requirements for quarterly and annual sales and use tax filing. Currently, a registered business with an annual sales and use tax liability not exceeding $300 must only file sales and use tax returns on an annual basis. If the retailer prefers to file on a quarterly basis, it must contact the department. The proposal would increase the $300 threshold to $600, allowing more businesses to file sales and use tax returns on an annual basis. The change to the filing threshold would be effective January 1, 2014.

Based on information from state sales and use tax returns, the rule change is expected to affect 8,091 filers. While the proposal does not impact tax liabilities, sales tax returns for quarters ending March 31 and June 30 would be due Dec 31 of the next fiscal year. Assuming all affected businesses file on an annual basis, the proposal would result in a $1.7 million non-recurring loss in FY14.

County and stadium sales and use taxes were 8.2% of state sales and use taxes in FY13. Assuming this does not change, county and stadium taxes would decrease by $140,000 (non-recurring loss) in FY14.

Notice of Hearing

Safety and Professional Services —
Marriage and Family Therapy, Professional Counseling and Social Work Examining Board

CR 13-117

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to authority vested in the Marriage and Family Therapy, Professional Counseling and Social Work Examining Board in ss. 15.08 (5) (b) and 457.22 (1) , Wis. Stats., and interpreting s. 457.22 , Wis. Stats., the Marriage and Family Therapy, Professional Counseling and Social Work Examining Board will hold a public hearing at the time and place indicated below to consider an order to repeal Chapter MPSW 8 and section MPSW 14.03 , and to repeal and recreate Chapter MPSW 19 , relating to continuing education.

Hearing Information

Date:   Tuesday, February 4, 2014
Time:   9:05 a.m.
Location:   1400 East Washington Avenue
  Room 121C
  Madison, Wisconsin

Appearances at the Hearing

Interested persons are invited to present information at the hearing. Persons appearing may make an oral presentation but are urged to submit facts, opinions and argument in writing as well. Facts, opinions and argument may also be submitted in writing without a personal appearance by mail addressed to the Department of Safety and Professional Services, Division of Policy Development, P.O. Box 8935, Madison, Wisconsin 53708. Written comments must be received at or before the public hearing to be included in the record of rule-making proceedings.

Place where Comments are to be Submitted and Deadline for Submission

Comments may be submitted to Sharon Henes, Administrative Rules Coordinator, Department of Safety and Professional Services, Division of Policy Development, 1400 East Washington Avenue, Room 151, P.O. Box 8935, Madison, WI 53708-8935, or by email to [e-mail] . Comments must be received at or before the public hearing to be held on February 4, 2014 at 9:05 a.m. to be included in the record of rule-making proceedings.

Copies of Rule

Copies of this proposed rule are available upon request to Sharon Henes, Administrative Rules Coordinator, Department of Safety and Professional Services, Division of Policy Development, 1400 East Washington Avenue, P.O. Box 8935, Madison, Wisconsin 53708, or by email at [e-mail] .

Analysis Prepared by the Department of Safety and Professional Services

Statutes interpreted

Section 457.22 , Wis. Stats.

Statutory authority

Sections 15.08 (5) (b) and 457.22 (1) , Wis. Stats.

Explanation of agency authority

The examining board shall promulgate rules for its own guidance and for the guidance of the professional.

The examining board may promulgate rules establishing requirements and procedures for social workers, advanced practice social workers, independent social workers, clinical social workers, marriage and family therapists, and professional counselors to complete continuing education programs or courses of study in order to qualify for renewal of their credential.

Related statute or rule

Section 457.22 , Wis. Stats.

Plain language analysis

This rule combines the three current chapters on continuing education into one chapter which covers social workers, advanced practice social workers, independent social workers, clinical social workers, marriage and family therapists, and professional counselors.

Sections 1 and 2 delete the social worker and professional counselor continuing education requirements.

Section 3 repeals the marriage and family therapist continuing education requirements and recreates the new chapter which covers all professionals credentialed by Board.

The new chapter begins with definitions for the chapter.

The next section lists the continuing education requirement at 30 hours with at least 4 of those hours in ethics. As to ethics, marriage and family therapists would need to take ethics related to their profession only unless credentialed by another section and social worker ethics would need to be taken in an interactive learning format which is defined. Continuing education is not required during the initial licensure period. Continuing education may not be applied to a different credential period nor may continuing education taken as a result of a disciplinary action be counted.

The next section indicates how continuing education may be earned. Continuing education may be earned through approved program providers; postgraduate courses; in house trainings; presenting or developing professional materials for approved programs; postgraduate educators; authorship of published textbook or article; and authorship of alternative or electronic media or computer software.

The next section delineates the requirements for postponement and waivers for hardships and exemptions due to retirement. If a person retires and then returns to practice, continuing education would need to be completed.

The last section of the chapter provides for a record retention requirement of a minimum of 4 years and that audits may be conducted to determine compliance with the continuing education requirements.

Section 4 is the effective date of the rules which is the first day of the month following publication in the administrative register.

Summary of, and comparison with, existing or proposed federal regulation

None

Comparison with rules in adjacent states

Illinois: In Illinois, each marriage and family therapist, professional counselor and social worker credential holder shall complete 30 hours of continuing education. Continuing education hours may be earned for attending programs, courses, and postgraduate training programs; teaching and presenting programs and courses; and authorship of papers or books. Professional counselors also have an 18 credit hours in clinical supervision training as a one time (lifetime) requirement for continuing education. Social workers have a 3 credit hours requirement in ethics every two years.

Iowa: In Iowa, each marriage and family therapist and licensed mental health counselor, shall complete 40 hours of continuing education of which 3 hours shall be in the area of ethics.. Continuing education may be earned by attendance at workshops, conferences and academic courses; presenting professional programs; and scholarly research which is published. Each social work credential holder shall complete 27 hours of continuing education of which 3 hours shall be in the area of ethics. Continuing education may be earned by attendance at sponsored activities and programs; pro-bono or volunteer work; instruction of a program or course; authorship of papers, publications; and preparation of presentations and exhibits before a professional audience. Those credential holders who provide supervision shall complete 3 hours of the required 27 hours in supervision.

Michigan: Michigan does not require continuing education for marriage and family therapists or professional counselors. In Michigan, social work credentials shall complete 45 hours continuing education in a three year period. At least 5 of the hours shall be in ethics and 1 hour in pain and pain symptom management.

Minnesota: In Minnesota, marriage and family therapists shall complete 30 hours of continuing education. Continuing education may be earned by attendance at workshops, seminars, symposia or postgraduate institutes; teaching a course, workshop, seminar, symposia or at a meeting of professional organizations; research; and authorship of a book or article. Professional counselors in the first four years shall complete 12 graduate semester credits and 40 hours of continuing education and after the first four years, only 40 hours of continuing education. Continuing education may be earned by attendance at approved programs or courses; teaching a postgraduate course; authoring, editing, producing or reviewing in the area of professional counseling; presentations at approved programs; and serving as a board or committee member of a major state or national professional counseling organization, national counselor certification board, a state counseling licensure board and a major counseling conference or convention. Each social worker credential shall complete 40 hours of continuing education and at least 2 hours in ethics. Continuing education may be earned by academic coursework; educational workshops, seminars or conferences offered by an approved organization; staff training offered by public or private employer; and independent study. Licensed independent clinical social workers are required to complete 24 hours in the clinical content area. Those providing supervision shall complete at least 6 hours in supervision.

Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies

The Board examined each Section's rules with the goal of having just one chapter on continuing education for all credentials granted by the Board. The Board also looked at recent audits which revealed confusion among credential holders who have more than one credential with the Board.

Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small business or in preparation of economic impact analysis

In preparation of the EIA, the rule was posted for economic comments for a period of 14 days and received no comments.

Fiscal Estimate and Economic Impact Analysis

The Fiscal Estimate and Economic Impact Analysis is attached.

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis or Summary

These proposed rules do not have an economic impact on small businesses, as defined in s. 227.114 (1) , Stats.

Agency Contact Person

Sharon Henes, Administrative Rules Coordinator, Department of Safety and Professional Services, Division of Policy Development, 1400 East Washington Avenue, Room 151, P.O. Box 8935, Madison, Wisconsin 53708; telephone [phone]; email at [e-mail] .

STATE OF WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION DOA-2049 (R03/2012)	Division of Executive Budget and Finance 101 East Wilson Street, 10th Floor P.O. Box 7864 Madison, WI 53707-7864 FAX: [phone]
ADMINISTRATIVE RULES Fiscal Estimate & Economic Impact Analysis

1. Type of Estimate and Analysis
X Original   ⍽ Updated   ⍽ Corrected
2. Administrative Rule Chapter, Title and Number
MPSW 8, 14, 19
3. Subject
Continuing education
4. Fund Sources Affected			5. Chapter 20, Stats. Appropriations Affected
⍽ GPR   ⍽ FED   X PRO   ⍽ PRS   ⍽ SEG   ⍽ SEG-S			20.165(1)(g)
6. Fiscal Effect of Implementing the Rule
⍽ No Fiscal Effect ⍽ Indeterminate	⍽ Increase Existing Revenues ⍽ Decrease Existing Revenues		⍽ Increase Costs X Could Absorb Within Agency's Budget ⍽ Decrease Cost
7. The Rule Will Impact the Following (Check All That Apply)
⍽ State's Economy ⍽ Local Government Units		⍽ Specific Businesses/Sectors ⍽ Public Utility Rate Payers ⍽ Small Businesses (if checked, complete Attachment A)
8. Would Implementation and Compliance Costs Be Greater Than $20 million? ⍽ Yes   X No
9. Policy Problem Addressed by the Rule
This rule combines the three Sections of the Board's continuing education rule into one chapter as well as updating the requirements to create clarity and utilize current methods of delivery.
10. Summary of the businesses, business sectors, associations representing business, local governmental units, and individuals that may be affected by the proposed rule that were contacted for comments.
None
11. Identify the local governmental units that participated in the development of this EIA.
None
12. Summary of Rule's Economic and Fiscal Impact on Specific Businesses, Business Sectors, Public Utility Rate Payers, Local Governmental Units and the State's Economy as a Whole (Include Implementation and Compliance Costs Expected to be Incurred)
This rule will not have an economic nor fiscal impact on specific businesses, business sectors, public utility rate payers, local governmental units of the state's economy as a whole.
13. Benefits of Implementing the Rule and Alternative(s) to Implementing the Rule
The benefit is to create clarity and reduce the confusion which was revealed during the recent continuing education audits.
14. Long Range Implications of Implementing the Rule
The long range implication is clarity with the continuing education requirements. Credential holders will not be face disciplinary action for failing to complete the correct continuing education due to confusion with the requirements if they hold multiple MPSW credentials.
15. Compare With Approaches Being Used by Federal Government
None
16. Compare With Approaches Being Used by Neighboring States (Illinois, Iowa, Michigan and Minnesota )
Illinois requires credential holders in all three professions to complete 30 hours of continuing education. Iowa requires marriage and family therapists and licensed mental health counselors to complete 40 hours of continuing education and social workers to complete 27 hours of continuing education. Michigan only requires continuing education for social workers and the number of hours is 45 for a three year period. Minnesota requires marriage and family therapists to complete 30 hours of continuing education and the professional counselors and social worker credential holders to complete 40 hours of continuing educations. All states list the acceptable methods in which continuing education may be earned as well as any specific topic areas which must be address in their continuing education.
17. Contact Name				18. Contact Phone Number
Sharon Henes				[phone]

This document can be made available in alternate formats to individuals with disabilities upon request.

Notice of Hearing

Safety and Professional Services —
Marriage and Family Therapy, Professional Counseling and Social Work Examining Board

CR 13-118

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to authority vested in the Marriage and Family Therapy, Professional Counseling and Social Work Examining Board in s. 15.08 (5) (b) , Wis. Stats., and interpreting s. 457.01 (8m) , Wis. Stats., the Marriage and Family Therapy, Professional Counseling and Social Work Examining Board will hold a public hearing at the time and place indicated below to consider an order to repeal sections MPSW 2.01 (14) and 10.01 (3m) , relating to the definition of psychotherapy.

Hearing Information

Date:   Tuesday, February 4, 2014
Time:   9:00 a.m.
Location:   1400 East Washington Avenue
  Room 121C
  Madison, Wisconsin

Appearances at the Hearing

Interested persons are invited to present information at the hearing. Persons appearing may make an oral presentation but are urged to submit facts, opinions and argument in writing as well. Facts, opinions and argument may also be submitted in writing without a personal appearance by mail addressed to the Department of Safety and Professional Services, Division of Policy Development, P.O. Box 8935, Madison, Wisconsin 53708. Written comments must be received at or before the public hearing to be included in the record of rule-making proceedings.

Place where Comments are to be Submitted and Deadline for Submission

Comments may be submitted to Sharon Henes, Administrative Rules Coordinator, Department of Safety and Professional Services, Division of Policy Development, 1400 East Washington Avenue, Room 151, P.O. Box 8935, Madison, WI 53708-8935, or by email to [e-mail] . Comments must be received at or before the public hearing to be held on February 4, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. to be included in the record of rule-making proceedings.

Copies of Rule

Copies of this proposed rule are available upon request to Sharon Henes, Administrative Rules Coordinator, Department of Safety and Professional Services, Division of Policy Development, 1400 East Washington Avenue, P.O. Box 8935, Madison, Wisconsin 53708, or by email at [e-mail] .

Analysis prepared by the Department of Safety and Professional Services

Statutes interpreted

Section 457.01 (8m) , Wis. Stats.

Statutory authority

Section 15.08 (5) (b) , Wis. Stats.

Explanation of agency authority

Each examining board shall promulgate rules for its own guidance and for the guidance of the trade or profession to which it pertains, and define and enforce professional conduct and unethical practices not inconsistent with the law relating to the particular trade or profession.

Related statute or rule

Section 457.01 (8m) , Wis. Stats., and s. MPSW 1.02 (2m) , Wis. Admin. Code

Plain language analysis

The rule repeals two definitions of psychotherapy. Section MPSW 1.02 (2) is a definition which applies to the all the MPSW chapters and is identical to s. 457.01 (8) statutory definition.

Summary of, and comparison with, existing or proposed federal regulation

None

Comparison with rules in adjacent states

Illinois: The Illinois practice acts for marriage and family therapy, professional counseling and social work do not define the word psychotherapy.

Iowa: The Iowa practice acts for marriage and family therapy, professional counseling, and social work do not define the word psychotherapy.

Michigan: The Michigan practice acts for marriage and family therapy, professional counseling, and social work do not define the word psychotherapy.

Minnesota: The Michigan practice acts for marriage and family therapy, professional counseling, and social work do not define the word psychotherapy.

Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies

The Board is repealing two definitions for a word that is already defined by the MPSW code therefore eliminating conflicting definitions.

Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small business or in preparation of economic impact analysis

This rule was posted for 14 days for economic impact comments and none were received. This rule repeals 2 definitions which did not match the statutory definition of psychotherapy.

Fiscal Estimate and Economic Impact Analysis

The Fiscal Estimate and Economic Impact Analysis is attached.

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis or Summary

This rule does not have impact on small businesses.

Agency Contact Person

Sharon Henes, Administrative Rules Coordinator, Department of Safety and Professional Services, Division of Policy Development, 1400 East Washington Avenue, Room 151, P.O. Box 8935, Madison, Wisconsin 53708; telephone [phone]; email at [e-mail] .

STATE OF WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION DOA-2049 (R03/2012)	Division of Executive Budget and Finance 101 East Wilson Street, 10th Floor P.O. Box 7864 Madison, WI 53707-7864 FAX: [phone]
ADMINISTRATIVE RULES Fiscal Estimate & Economic Impact Analysis

1. Type of Estimate and Analysis
X Original   ⍽ Updated   ⍽ Corrected
2. Administrative Rule Chapter, Title and Number
MPSW 2.01(14) and 10.01(3m)
3. Subject
Psychotherapy definition
4. Fund Sources Affected			5. Chapter 20, Stats. Appropriations Affected
⍽ GPR   ⍽ FED   X PRO   ⍽ PRS   ⍽ SEG   ⍽ SEG-S			20.165(1)(g)
6. Fiscal Effect of Implementing the Rule
X No Fiscal Effect ⍽ Indeterminate	⍽ Increase Existing Revenues ⍽ Decrease Existing Revenues		⍽ Increase Costs ⍽ Could Absorb Within Agency's Budget ⍽ Decrease Cost
7. The Rule Will Impact the Following (Check All That Apply)
⍽ State's Economy ⍽ Local Government Units		⍽ Specific Businesses/Sectors ⍽ Public Utility Rate Payers ⍽ Small Businesses (if checked, complete Attachment A)
8. Would Implementation and Compliance Costs Be Greater Than $20 million? ⍽ Yes   X No
9. Policy Problem Addressed by the Rule
The rule repeals two definitions for a word already defined in the MPSW code and eliminates the conflicting definitions.
10. Summary of the businesses, business sectors, associations representing business, local governmental units, and individuals that may be affected by the proposed rule that were contacted for comments.
None
11. Identify the local governmental units that participated in the development of this EIA.
None
12. Summary of Rule's Economic and Fiscal Impact on Specific Businesses, Business Sectors, Public Utility Rate Payers, Local Governmental Units and the State's Economy as a Whole (Include Implementation and Compliance Costs Expected to be Incurred)
There is no economic or fiscal impact on specific businesses, business sectors, public utility rate payers, local governmental units or the state's economy as a whole. In preparation of the EIA, the rule was posted for economic comments for a period of 14 days and received no comments.
13. Benefits of Implementing the Rule and Alternative(s) to Implementing the Rule
The benefit is to eliminate conflicting definitions.
14. Long Range Implications of Implementing the Rule
The long range implication is for clarity in the MPSW code.
15. Compare With Approaches Being Used by Federal Government
None
16. Compare With Approaches Being Used by Neighboring States (Illinois, Iowa, Michigan and Minnesota )
The four neighboring states do not define "psychotherapy" in the practice acts or rules for marriage and family therapy, professional counseling and social work.
17. Contact Name				18. Contact Phone Number
Sharon Henes				[phone]