Statutory authority
Explanation of agency authority
The examining board shall promulgate rules for its own guidance and for the guidance of the trade or profession to which it pertains, and define and enforce professional conduct and unethical practices not inconsistent with the law relating to the particular trade or profession.
Related statute or rule
Plain language analysis
The Social Worker Section issues a temporary certificate or license when all the licensure requirements are met with the exception of the examination. The statute states that a temporary certificate or license may be renewed once by that section of the examining board. This amendment will bring the rule into conformity with the statute.
Summary of, and comparison with, existing or proposed federal regulation
None.
Comparison with rules in adjacent states
Illinois:
Illinois no longer issues a temporary social worker credential.
Iowa:
Iowa does not have a temporary social worker credential.
Michigan:
Michigan grants a two year limited license to engage in the 2 year post degree experience to those who have completed the educational requirements for licensure. A limited license is renewable for not more than 6 years. Mich. Comp. Laws §
333.18509(2)
.
Minnesota:
Minnesota may grant a temporary license to practice social work to applicants who have completed the education and examination to those unlicensed or to applicants in emergency situations if licensed in another jurisdiction. This temporary license expires after six months. Minnesota also may grant a temporary license to an applicant who completed education from a program in candidacy status with an accrediting body or for an applicant to teach social work at an academic institution in Minnesota. These temporary licenses expire after 12 months. There is no provision indicating a renewal of the temporary license. Minn. Stat. § 148E.060
Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies
The factual data and methodology was to change the rule to be consistent with the statute.
Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small business or in preparation of economic impact analysis
This rule merely conforms the rule to the statute and there is no effect on small business.
This rule was posted for public comment on the economic impact of the proposed rule, including how this proposed rule may affect businesses, local government units and individuals, for a period of 14 days. No comments were received relating to the economic impact of the rule.
Fiscal Estimate and Economic Impact Analysis
The Fiscal Estimate and Economic Impact Analysis is attached.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis or Summary
These proposed rules do not have an economic impact on small businesses, as defined in s.
227.114 (1)
, Stats. The Department's Regulatory Review Coordinator may be contacted by email at
Tom.Engels@wisconsin.gov
, or by calling (608) 266-8608.
Agency Contact Person
Sharon Henes, Administrative Rules Coordinator, Department of Safety and Professional Services, Division of Policy Development, 1400 East Washington Avenue, Room 151, P.O. Box 8935, Madison, Wisconsin 53708; telephone 608-261-2377; email at
Sharon.Henes@wisconsin.gov
.
STATE OF WISCONSIN
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
DOA-2049 (R03/2012)
|
Division of Executive Budget and Finance
101 East Wilson Street, 10th Floor
P.O. Box 7864
Madison, WI 53707-7864
FAX: (608) 267-0372
|
ADMINISTRATIVE RULES
Fiscal Estimate & Economic Impact Analysis
|
1. Type of Estimate and Analysis
|
X
Original
⍽
Updated
⍽
Corrected
|
2. Administrative Rule Chapter, Title and Number
|
MPSW 3
|
3. Subject
|
Temporary credential
|
4. Fund Sources Affected
|
5. Chapter 20, Stats. Appropriations Affected
|
⍽
GPR
⍽
FED
⍽
PRO
⍽
PRS
⍽
SEG
⍽
SEG-S
|
|
6. Fiscal Effect of Implementing the Rule
|
X
No Fiscal Effect
⍽
Indeterminate
|
⍽
Increase Existing Revenues
⍽
Decrease Existing Revenues
|
⍽
Increase Costs
⍽
Could Absorb Within Agency's Budget
⍽
Decrease Cost
|
7. The Rule Will Impact the Following (Check All That Apply)
|
⍽
State's Economy
⍽
Local Government Units
|
⍽
Specific Businesses/Sectors
⍽
Public Utility Rate Payers
⍽
Small Businesses
(if checked, complete Attachment A)
|
8. Would Implementation and Compliance Costs Be Greater Than $20 million?
⍽
Yes
X
No
|
9. Policy Problem Addressed by the Rule
|
The statute states that a temporary credential may be renewed once by the Social Work section and the rule states it can't be renewed.
|
10. Summary of the businesses, business sectors, associations representing business, local governmental units, and individuals that may be affected by the proposed rule that were contacted for comments.
|
None
|
11. Identify the local governmental units that participated in the development of this EIA.
|
None
|
12. Summary of Rule's Economic and Fiscal Impact on Specific Businesses, Business Sectors, Public Utility Rate Payers, Local Governmental Units and the State's Economy as a Whole (Include Implementation and Compliance Costs Expected to be Incurred)
|
There is no economic or fiscal impact on specific businesses, business sectors, public utility rate payers, local governmental units. In preparation of the EIA, the rule was posted for economic comments for a period of at least 14 days and received no comments.
|
13. Benefits of Implementing the Rule and Alternative(s) to Implementing the Rule
|
The benefit of implement the rule is to have conformity with the statute.
|
14. Long Range Implications of Implementing the Rule
|
The benefit of implement the rule is to have conformity with the statute.
|
15. Compare With Approaches Being Used by Federal Government
|
None
|
16. Compare With Approaches Being Used by Neighboring States (Illinois, Iowa, Michigan and Minnesota
)
|
Illinois and Iowa do not have temporary social worker credentials. Michigan grants a two year limited license to engage in post degree experience and this limited license is renewable for not more than six years. Minnesota may grant a temporary license to practice social to applicants who have completed the education and exam to those unlicensed or to applicants in emergency situations if licensed in another jurisdiction and this temporary license expires after six months. Minnesota may also grant a temporary license to teach social work at an academic institution in Minnesota and this license expire after 12 months and there is no provision indicating a renewal.
|
17. Contact Name
|
18. Contact Phone Number
|
Sharon Henes
|
(608) 261-2377
|
This document can be made available in alternate formats to individuals with disabilities upon request.
Notice of Hearing
Transportation
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN That pursuant to ss.
85.16
,
227.11 (2)
,
348.25 (3)
,
348.26 (2)
, and
348.27 (2)
, Stats., the Department of Transportation will hold a public hearing to consider the an order to repeal ss. Trans254.10 (5) (title), (a) and (b), 255.03 (2) (b) (note) and 255.10 (5) (title), (a), and (b); to amend ss.
Trans 254.03 (2) (a)
and
(c)
,
(3) (note)
,
254.11 (1)
,
(2) (intro.)
and
(a)
to
(d)
,
(3) (intro.)
and
(b)
,
(4) (b)
,
254.12 (2)
,
254.16 (1)
and
(2)
,
255.03 (2) (a)
,
255.11(1)
,
(2) (intro.)
and
(a)
to
(d)
,
(3) (intro.)
and
(b)
,
(4) (intro.)
and
(b)
, and
255.12 (2)
; and to create ss.
Trans 254.02 (2) (c)
and
(note)
,
254.03 (1m)
,
254.11 (2) (d)
(note)
,
(4a) (note)
,
254.15 (5)
and
(note)
,
255.02 (2) (c)
and
(note)
,
255.03 (1m)
,
(2) (c)
, and
(note)
,
255.11 (2) (d)
(note)
,
(4a) (note)
, and
255.15 (5)
and
(5) (note)
, relating to single and multiple trip permits for oversize or overweight vehicles or loads and affecting small businesses.
Hearing Information
Date:
Thursday, January 9, 2014
Time:
9:00 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.
Hearing starts: 9:30 a.m.
Location:
Wisconsin Department of Transportation
DTSD — Milwaukee Field Office
Wisconsin Room — 2nd floor
1001 West St. Paul Avenue
Milwaukee, WI 53233
Date:
Thursday, January 23, 2014
Time:
9:00 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.
Hearing starts: 9:30 a.m.
Location:
Wisconsin Department of Transportation
Hill Farms State Transportation Building
4802 Sheboygan Avenue
Room 364
Madison, WI 53707
Accessibility
English
DOT is an equal opportunity employer and service provider. If you need accommodations because of a disability or need an interpreter or translator, or if you need this material in another language or in an alternate format, you may request assistance to participate by contacting Kathleen Nichols at 608-261-2574.You must make your request at least 7 days before the activity.
Spanish
El PUNTO es patrón de la oportunidad igual y abastecedor de servicio. Si usted necesita comodidades debido a una inhabilidad o necesita a un intérprete o a traductor, o si usted necesita este material en otra lengua o en un formato alterno, usted puede solicitar ayuda de participar entrando en contacto con a Kathleen Nichols en 608-261-2574. You debe hacer su petición por lo menos 7 días antes de la actividad.
Hmong
DOT yog ib cov chaw ua hauj lwm vaj huam sib luag thiab muab kev pab. Yog hais tias koj xav tau kev kho kom haum vim yog muaj mob xiam oob qhab los yog xav tau ib tug neeg txhais lus los txhais, los yog hais tias koj xav tau qhov khoom ntawd rau lwm hom lus los yog txhais ua lwm hom ntawv, koj yuav thov kev pab mus xamphaj Kathleen Nichols ntawm 608-261-2574. yuav tsum ua koj txoj kev thov txog li 7 hnub ua ntej qhov kev ua.
Copies of Proposed Rule and Fiscal Estimate - Economic Impact Analysis
A copy of the proposed rule and the fiscal estimate-economic impact analysis may be obtained from the Department of Transportation at no charge by downloading the documents from
www.adminrules.wisconsin.gov
or by contacting:
Kathleen Nichols
Motor Carrier Services Section, Division of Motor Vehicles
Wisconsin Department of Transportation
4802 Sheboygan Avenue, Room 151
P.O. Box 7980
Madison, WI 53707-7980
Place Where Comments are to be Submitted and Deadline for Submission
Comments may be submitted to Kathleen Nichols via e-mail or U.S. mail, or to the Wisconsin Administrative Rules Website at
www.adminrules.wisconsin.gov
until Friday, January 17, 2014, at 4:30 p.m.
Impact on Small Business
Pursuant to s.
227.114
, Stats., it is not anticipated that the proposed rule will have a negative economic impact on small business. The Department's Small Business Regulatory Coordinator, Michele Carter, may be contacted at: (414) 438-4587 or (608) 266-6961, or by e-mailing her at:
Michele.Carter@dot.wi.gov
.
Environmental Impact
The Department has made a preliminary determination that this action does not involve adverse environmental effects and does not need an environmental analysis. No petition has been received requesting an environmental analysis.
Analysis Prepared by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation
Statutes interpreted
Sections
85.16
,
227.11
,
348.02
,
348.05
,
348.06
,
348.07
,
348.09
,
348.10 (1)
,
348.11
,
348.15
,
348.17
,
348.18
,
349.16
,
348.25
,
348.26
, and
348.27
, Stats.
Statutory authority
Explanation of agency authority
Under s.
85.16
, Stats., the Department of Transportation (WisDOT) has the authority to make reasonable and uniform rules for the discharge of its powers, duties and functions. Section
227.11 (2)
, Stats., identifies areas where rule-making authority is expressly conferred upon agencies, including where necessary to effectuate the purpose of a statute, to prescribe forms and procedures, and to formalize general policies in deciding individual cases.
Sections
348.05 (1)
,
348.06 (1)
,
348.07 (1)
,
348.09 (1)
,
348.10 (1)
,
348.15 (3)
, and
348.17 (1)
, Stats., prohibit the operation of vehicles exceeding certain size and weight limits on highways without a permit. Under ss.
348.26 (2)
and
348.27 (2)
, Stats., the Department is authorized to issue permits for single and multiple trip vehicle loads exceeding these limits. Section
348.25 (3)
, Stats., requires the Department to prescribe forms for such permits. Chapters
Trans 254
and
255
effectuate the purposes of these statutes, prescribe forms and procedures, and formalize general policies in issuing single and multiple trip permits for the operation of oversize or overweight vehicles on highways under WisDOT's jurisdiction.
Related statute or rule
Chapter
348
, Stats., establishes restrictions on the operation of vehicles without a permit, based on vehicle size, weight and load. Chapters
Trans 250
to
253
,
254
(affected by this order), 255 (affected by this order), 256 to 263, and 269 establish standards and procedures for various permits under ch.
348
, Stats.
Plain language analysis
This rulemaking modifies regulations related to the transportation of oversize and overweight (OS/OW) vehicles and loads on Wisconsin highways. It is almost impossible to briefly summarize all the various rules and exceptions to rules governing the transportation of OS/OW loads. In general, trucks and their loads should be 8'-6" or narrower, 13'-6" or shorter, and less than 75' in length. Length requirements, in particular, are highly variable and range from 45' to 75' depending on the configuration of the truck hauling the load. Generally speaking, weight limits depend on the vehicle configuration, the class of highway and the time of year.
Special permission and precautions must be taken to insure that vehicles exceeding size and weight limits do not damage the highway facility or endanger other travelers. In order to operate a vehicle exceeding size and weight limits, state law requires the truck operator to first obtain a permit from the appropriate authority. On state highways, WisDOT is that authority. WisDOT issues OS/OW permits through the Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV) Motor Carrier Services Section, working in coordination with traffic and safety engineers from the Freight Operations Office of the Division of Transportation System Development (DTSD).
The proposed revisions to chs.
Trans 254
and
Trans 255
increase the hours OS/OW vehicles may operate on state highways, relax route limitations to reflect improvements to the Milwaukee County Freeway System, eliminate outdated requirements based on federal laws that have been repealed, update permit application provisions to reflect WisDOT's current practices, and require permittees to check WisDOT's 511 traffic information system.
Hours of operation.
One important consideration when issuing an oversize permit is the intended hours of operation (permitted over
weight
vehicles may normally operate 24 hours a day). Restricting oversize vehicle travel during a highway's busiest hours increases highway safety. Under current law, oversize vehicles are prohibited from operating throughout the state during what was once considered peak operating times. However, modern data collection tools used by DTSD and DMV make it possible for WisDOT to adopt more specific restrictions on travel times.
These revisions reduce the duration of weekend and holiday evening travel time restrictions. WisDOT also proposes to make these restrictions only applicable in certain counties, lifting evening oversize restrictions in other parts of the state. The results are summarized in the table below.
Current Law:
|
This Order:
|
•
Trans 254/Trans 255 permitted oversize vehicles may
not
travel:
|
Between 4:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. on Sunday.
Current Law:
|
Between 3:30 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. on Sunday.
This Order:
|
Between 4:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. on Friday between the 4th Friday in May and Labor Day.
|
Between 3:30 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. on Friday between the 4th Friday in May and November 1.
|
Between 4:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. on any holiday, or, when Independence Day falls on Sunday, on the following Monday; and,
|
Between 3:30 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. on any "restricted-travel holiday." (see definition below)
|
Between 4:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. on the day before any holiday, except that this restriction does not apply to Independence Day when it falls on a Sunday.
|
Between 3:30 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. on the day before any "restricted-travel holiday." (see definition below)
|
These restrictions apply throughout Wisconsin.
|
These restrictions apply only in Brown, Columbia, Dane, Eau Claire, Milwaukee, Rock and Waukesha Counties.
|
•
On the Milwaukee County Expressway System:
|
Oversize vehicles may not operate between 3:30 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. Friday and Sunday.
|
Oversize vehicles may not operate between 3:30 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. Friday and Sunday.
|
Vehicles that are exceptionally large (that is, vehicles wider than 12', taller than 13'-6", or longer than 100') will continue to be restricted to operating during daylight hours and may not travel on "restricted-travel holidays" from 12:00 noon of the day before the holiday until sunrise of the day after the holiday.
"Restricted-travel holidays."
The proposed revisions to chs.
Trans 254
and
Trans 255
define a new term, "restricted-travel holidays." The definition reflects that not every legal holiday, as defined in Wis. Stat. s.
995.20
, is associated with an increase in traffic that would necessitate oversize travel restrictions. Instead, WisDOT will issue a list of restricted-travel holidays for each following year. In the event no list is issued, default restricted-travel holidays are designated. As clarified in the added note, WisDOT's list will typically include the default restricted-travel holidays, as well as peak travel times associated with gun deer hunting season.
Route Limitations.
Under current law, an oversize vehicle may not operate on the Milwaukee County Expressway System if the vehicle is wider than 11', taller than 13'-6", or longer than 100'. Since the current rule was adopted, the geometry of the Expressway System has been improved. The proposed revisions adopt restrictions that more accurately reflect the current geometrical restraints: vehicles may not be wider than 14', taller than 14'-6", or longer than 125'.
Outdated Federal Requirements.
Under current law, oversized vehicle permittees may be required to fasten certain reflective black and white or black and yellow hazard markers to their loads. This provision incorporated federal regulations that have since been repealed. WisDOT does not currently require hazard markers under this provision and other load-marking requirements adequately protect the public safety. The proposed revisions to chs.
Trans 254
and
Trans 255
eliminate the hazard marker provision.
WisDOT's 511 System.
WisDOT has developed a free, publicly-available, online traffic information system. Other private systems that report real-time traffic conditions may also be available. Timely use of such systems alerts drivers to potential hazards that could jeopardize safe transport of the load. The proposed revisions to chs.
Trans 254
and
Trans 255
require that permittees check either WisDOT's 511 website or an equivalent website prior to departure.
Permit Procedure Updates and Non-Substantive Revisions
. Several areas of the current Trans 254 and Trans 255 list steps or procedures that are no longer used by WisDOT when processing single and multiple trip OS/OW permits. Generally speaking, WisDOT procedures have been centralized and made electronic to the extent feasible. The proposed revisions to Trans 254 and Trans 255 reflect the current application process.
Additionally, this revision incorporates a change to language involving escort vehicles. Under current law, s.
Trans 254.16
indicates that the permittee may "be required...to provide
…
2 escorts
…
." [Trans 254.16 (1).] Additionally, loads 16' or wider "shall have 2 properly equipped escorts." [Trans 254.16 (2).] However, these provisions are inconsistent with WisDOT's authority and current practice. WisDOT has the authority to impose reasonable conditions on OS/OW permits under s.
348.25 (3)
, Stats. Section
Trans 252.03 (1)
authorizes WisDOT or a local authority to require the use of one or more escort vehicles as a reasonable condition of any OS/OW permit. Under current practice, WisDOT routinely requires permittees to provide the number of escort vehicles necessary, which may or may not be 2 escorts. The proposed revisions to s.
Trans 254.16
indicate that "at least" or "a minimum of" 2 escorts will be required in certain circumstances. These revisions more closely resemble the language of the rule with s. Trans 252, s.
348.25 (3)
, Stats., and other laws, as well as with current practice, resulting in no measureable or meaningful change. [Wis. Stat. s.
227.135 (4)
.]
Summary of, and preliminary comparison with, existing or proposed federal regulation
The Federal Government first enacted size regulations for commercial motor vehicles ("CMVs") with the passage of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956. This Act provided a maximum vehicle width of 96 inches (8 feet or 2.44 meters) on the Interstate Highway System. Subsequently, the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1976 increased the allowable width for buses to 102 inches (8.5 feet or 2.6 meters). The Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 extended the same bus width requirement of 102 inches to commercial trucks. At the same time, the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 expanded the highway network (on which the Federal width provision applied) from the Interstate to the National Network of highways.
Loads exceeding these dimensions may only be transported on the National Network with an oversize permit.
The Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 also regulated the length of CMV's. In 1982, Congress established minimum length standards for most commercial truck tractor-semitrailers and for twin trailers pulled behind a truck tractor. Congressional involvement in vehicle length reflected the desire to standardize the enforcement of length along the National Network. This standardization sought to eliminate administrative or operating confusion caused by varying State provisions governing commercial vehicle length.
Wisconsin complies with these federal requirements. This rule governs vehicles much larger than the minimum dimensions for which permits are required for operation under federal law.
There is no Federal vehicle height requirement or restriction for commercial motor vehicles. Thus, States may set their own height restrictions. Most state height limits range from 13'-6" (4.11 meters) to 14' (4.27 meters), with exceptions granted for lower clearance on particular roads.
Federal standards for construction of interstate highways set minimum vertical clearance under overhead structures (including over paved shoulders) at 16' (4.88 meters) in rural areas, and at 14' (4.27 meters) in urban areas, with allowance for extra layers of pavement. In urban areas, at least one route should have 16' (4.88-meter) clearances. Sign supports and pedestrian overpasses must be at least 17' (5.18 meters) above the road, with exceptions for some urban routes.
Not all freeways and interstate highways in Wisconsin meet these standards. Milwaukee County, in particular, has a concentration of overhead structure clearances that fail to meet these standards.
Comparison with rules in the following states
Michigan.
The Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) permits OS/OW vehicles under single and "extended" or annual permits. OS/OW vehicles are generally permitted to operate throughout the weekend, except on Sunday evenings past 3:00 p.m. MDOT processes permit applications electronically. MDOT also maintains an online bulletin of active permit restrictions, detailing limitations on different routes due to conditions. More information on MDOT's OS/OW vehicle permitting program is available at:
http://www.michigan.gov/mdot/0
,1607,7-151-9623_26662_26679_27267_48606-182174--,00.html
.
Minnesota.
The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) issues OS/OW permits for travel over interstate highways and state trunk highways in Minnesota. MnDOT issues both single trip permits and seasonal or annual permits; like Wisconsin, Minnesota offers specific permits for types of loads, including the transport of root vegetable harvests and forest products. MnDOT OS/OW permits may be obtained online, by fax, or at MnDOT's St. Paul Central Office.
Except in the Twin Cities and Duluth and during summer weekends, loads generally do not face hours-of-operation restrictions unless noted on the permit. In these metro areas, larger oversize vehicles are not allowed to travel during morning or evening rush hours. From Memorial Day to Labor Day, no oversize vehicles may travel after 2 p.m. on Fridays and Sundays. MnDOT maintains a list of holidays with more specific travel restrictions on its website. For larger loads, MnDOT requires permit applicants to perform a pre-survey of the intended route by physically driving the route. MnDOT also maintains a traffic condition website,
http://www.511mn.org/
. More information on MnDOT's OS/OW permit program is available at:
http://www.dot.state.mn.us/cvo/oversize/oversize.html
.
Illinois
. The Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) is authorized by 625 ILCS 5/12 – 301 (the Illinois Vehicle Code) and 92 Ill. Admin. Code 554 to issue OS/OW permits on IDOT highways. In general, oversize vehicles may operate from a half hour before sunrise to a half hour after sunset, 7 days a week. Larger oversize vehicles may only operate Monday through Friday and until noon on Saturday. Hours of operation are further restricted during specific holidays and holiday weekends. Additional restrictions also apply within the City of Chicago and in Cook County. Operation on Illinois Toll Roads requires the permission of the Illinois Toll Authority.
To order an OS/OW permit, applicants are directed to use IDOT's "ITAP" online permitting system. Illinois also maintains an online map system that shows obstructions and permit restrictions throughout the states. More information on IDOT's OS/OW permit program is available at:
https://truckpermits.dot.illinois.gov/
. IDOT's mapping system is available at
http://www.gettingaroundillinois.com/
gai.htm?mt=tpr
.
Iowa
. The Iowa Department of Transportation issues OS/OW load permits for travel over interstate highways and state trunk highways. Single trip and annual permits are available, with different limitations on their use. State, county and city oversize load permits must be obtained separately. Except for a state issued All-Systems Permit authorized by a participating county or city, state-issued permits are not valid on county and city highways. County and city permits are also not valid on state highways.
Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies used and how the related findings support the regulatory approach chosen
See Fiscal Estimate.
Analysis and supporting documentation used to determine effect on small businesses
See Fiscal Estimate.
Effect on Small Business
Positive.
Fiscal Effect
None for government.
Anticipated Costs Incurred by Private Sector
None.
Agency Contact Person and Place Where Comments are to be Submitted and Deadline for Submission
The public record on this proposed rule making will be held open until close of business the day of the hearing to permit the submission of comments in lieu of public hearing testimony or comments supplementing testimony offered at the hearing. Any such comments should be submitted to:
Kathleen Nichols
Motor Carrier Services Section, Division of Motor Vehicles
Wisconsin Department of Transportation
4802 Sheboygan Avenue, Room 151
P. O. Box 7980,
Madison, WI 53707-7980.
Phone: (608) 261-2574
E-mail:
Kathleen.Nichols@dot.wi.gov
.
STATE OF WISCONSIN
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
DOA-2049 (R03/2012)
|
Division of Executive Budget and Finance
101 East Wilson Street, 10th Floor
P.O. Box 7864
Madison, WI 53707-7864
FAX: (608) 267-0372
|
ADMINISTRATIVE RULES
Fiscal Estimate & Economic Impact Analysis
|
1. Type of Estimate and Analysis
|
X
Original
⍽
Updated
⍽
Corrected
|
2. Administrative Rule Chapter, Title and Number
|
Ch. Trans 254 Single Trip Permits for Oversize or Overweight Vehicles or Loads
Ch. Trans 255 Multiple Trip Permits for Oversize or Overweight Vehicles or Loads
|
3. Subject
|
Credential authorizing vehicles exceeding legal size and weight limits
|
4. Fund Sources Affected
|
5. Chapter 20, Stats. Appropriations Affected
|
⍽
GPR
⍽
FED
⍽
PRO
⍽
PRS
⍽
SEG
⍽
SEG-S
|
N/A
|
6. Fiscal Effect of Implementing the Rule
|
X
No Fiscal Effect
⍽
Indeterminate
|
⍽
Increase Existing Revenues
⍽
Decrease Existing Revenues
|
⍽
Increase Costs
⍽
Could Absorb Within Agency's Budget
⍽
Decrease Cost
|
7. The Rule Will Impact the Following (Check All That Apply)
|
X
State's Economy
X
Local Government Units
|
X
Specific Businesses/Sectors
⍽
Public Utility Rate Payers
X
Small Businesses
(if checked, complete Attachment A)
|
8. Would Implementation and Compliance Costs Be Greater Than $20 million?
⍽
Yes
X
No, implementation costs will be outreach efforts
.
|
9. Policy Problem Addressed by the Rule
|
Current rule impedes motor carriers ability to meet contractual obligations.
|
10. Summary of the businesses, business sectors, associations representing business, local governmental units, and individuals that may be affected by the proposed rule that were contacted for comments.
|
WI AGC, Milwaukee AGC, WI Motor Carriers Assn., WI Manufacturers, Commerce, WI Transportation Builders
|
11. Identify the local governmental units that participated in the development of this EIA.
|
City of Milwaukee; Brown, Columbia, Dane, Eau Claire, Milwaukee, and Waukesha Counties
|
12. Summary of Rule's Economic and Fiscal Impact on Specific Businesses, Business Sectors, Public Utility Rate Payers, Local Governmental Units and the State's Economy as a Whole (Include Implementation and Compliance Costs Expected to be Incurred)
|
No negative impact expected to business or local governments. It is an effort to remove outdated restrictions that are no longer needed to maintain roadway safety for other users of the state and local roads.
|
13. Benefits of Implementing the Rule and Alternative(s) to Implementing the Rule
|
Improving transport efficiency; reducing construction costs; responding to industry request to continue with over-ride practices.
|
14. Long Range Implications of Implementing the Rule
|
Improving cross-border motor carrier regulation; Commerce should be more cost efficient.
|
15. Compare With Approaches Being Used by Federal Government
|
N/A
|
16. Compare With Approaches Being Used by Neighboring States (Illinois, Iowa, Michigan and Minnesota
)
|
Bringing WI operating hours closer to those of Iowa, Illinois, and Minnesota
|
17. Contact Name
|
18. Contact Phone Number
|
Kathleen Nichols, Permit Chief
|
608-261-2572
|
This document can be made available in alternate formats to individuals with disabilities upon request.
ATTACHMENT A
|
1. Summary of Rule's Economic and Fiscal Impact on Small Businesses (Separately for each Small Business Sector, Include Implementation and Compliance Costs Expected to be Incurred)
|
The economic and fiscal assessment activity done by the Department after the Scope Statement was published shows that that there will be no negative economic or fiscal impact on small business. Businesses will experience significant relief from costs arising from route and time of operation limits in the current language of Chapter Trans 254 and 255. Polled companies estimate that current rule language results in a $5 per mile additional transport cost, especially for companies that are located in or near Milwaukee County. In addition, delay in delivery that may arise from current rule provisions can result in $2,000 to $5,000 per hour additional costs arising from idle cranes, workers, and liquidated damages.
Small businesses should experience no new costs to comply with Chapter Trans 254 or 255 as a result of amendments as proposed for this rule-making. The Department will be required to re-print a number of documents, and that cost will be absorbed within the agency's budget.
|
2. Summary of the data sources used to measure the Rule's impact on Small Businesses
|
The Division of Transportation System Development of at the DOT contracted with CMQue, a sub-contractor of Cambridge Systematics, Inc., to interview selected small businesses likely to be affected by the amendment of Chapter Trans 254 and 255. The firms selected were companies that rent or lease heavy specialized equipment or manufacture goods of a size or weight that will require an oversize/overweight permit and a Wisconsin-based specialized motor carrier that frequently orders trucking permits from the Department.
In addition, staff of the Department polled the motor carrier members of the Motor Carrier Advisory Committee – OSOW Subcommittee, most of the members of which are small businesses.
Finally, the interest groups identified earlier in this submission, which represent small businesses, were asked to evaluate the likely effect of the proposed changes. All support the direction of these proposed amendments to Chapter Trans 254 and 255.
|
3. Did the agency consider the following methods to reduce the impact of the Rule on Small Businesses?
|
⍽
Less Stringent Compliance or Reporting Requirements
⍽
Less Stringent Schedules or Deadlines for Compliance or Reporting
⍽
Consolidation or Simplification of Reporting Requirements
⍽
Establishment of performance standards in lieu of Design or Operational Standards
⍽
Exemption of Small Businesses from some or all requirements
X
Other, describe:
Since it is anticipated that the impact on Small Businesses will be positive, these methods were not considered.
|
4. Describe the methods incorporated into the Rule that will reduce its impact on Small Businesses
|
The proposed amendments will increase the number of hours and days during which oversize/overweight goods may be transported in Wisconsin, and will bring Wisconsin into closer conformity with Minnesota and Iowa travel hours and days. The modest increases in vehicle size that will be allowed on the Milwaukee Expressway will reduce miles travelled and congestion caused by very large and heavy vehicles operating on surface streets.
|
5. Describe the Rule's Enforcement Provisions
|
No change in enforcement of the permits issued under the auspices of Chapter Trans 254 or 255 is anticipated. Wisconsin State Patrol, the primary enforcement agency for commercial motor carriage will apprise its personnel after promulgation of the amended rules. The Motor Carrier Services Section of the Division of Motor Vehicle will widely promote the new, less-restrictive, rules.
|
6. Did the Agency prepare a Cost Benefit Analysis (if Yes, attach to form)
|
⍽
Yes
X
No
|