CR_09-055 Hearing to consider rules to revise s. Ins 17.28 (3h), relating to supervision and direction.  

  • None.
    Explanation of agency authority
    Pursuant to ch. 551 , Stats., the department regulates securities.
    Summary of proposed rule
    The purpose of the rule is as follows:
    Section 1. These amendments are necessary to clarify that these apply to federally-covered advisors, their investment adviser representatives and state advisers, and also to correct cross references.
    Section 2. This section can be repealed as duplicative to the definition in s. 551.102(11)(m), Stats.
    Section 3. As a result of 2007 Wisconsin Act 196 , these exemptions are no longer necessary.
    Section 4. These sections can be repealed because of the language and scope of the merger/reorganization and employee benefit plan registration exemptions resulting from 2007 Wisconsin Act 196 .
    Section 5. These amendments provide for an electronic filing alternative (to the existing hard copy notice filing provision) for federal Regulation D/Rule 506 securities offerings that are or will be made in Wisconsin.
    Section 6. This amendment provides specific recognition of electronic prospectus delivery modes that comply with federal requirements on the subject.
    Section 7. The amendment to s. DFI-Sec 4.01 (3) clarifies that if an applicant has received a waiver, he or she need not again take and pass such exams. The amendments to s. DFI-Sec 4.01 (4) (e) to (g) clarify that the even though the applicant may receive a waiver, it does not relieve the applicant from passing one of the state law exams.
    Section 8. Section DFI-Sec 5.01 (4) (a) embodies two distinct waiver concepts that are best separated, and the amendment eliminates a conflict with (b). Amending s. DFI-Sec 5.01 (4) (b) preserves the minimum qualification standard envisioned by s. DFI-Sec 5.01 (3) .
    Section 9. Corrects a citation.
    Section 10. Is necessary to provide the exemption from registration for investment adviser representatives of noticed filed federal covered investment advisers in order to comply with the provisions of federal law.
    Section 11. Because of the change from "licensing" to "registration" for broker-dealer and investment adviser matters, these amendments help differentiate between "licensee" matters and registration of securities matters.
    Section 12. Form IAR (WI) is no longer necessary because renewals are handled via IARD, and form IAUSR(WI) will be discontinued as part of the application process.
    Comparison with federal regulations
    There are no newly-developed or proposed federal regulations addressed by this rule. However, Wisconsin Securities Law and rules are generally coordinated with corresponding federal requirements, pursuant to s. 551.615 , Stats.
    Comparison with rules in adjacent states
    These rule chapters reflect the 2002 Uniform Securities Act which Iowa and Minnesota have adopted and written rules; Illinois and Michigan have not.
    Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies
    The division applied its own experience in its regulation of securities generally for the minor clarifications, corrections, revisions and examination matters addressed by the rule.
    Small Business Impact
    The rule makes minor clarifications, corrections and revisions for conformity with existing statutes; imposes no additional substantive requirements; and reduces the same.
    Fiscal Estimate
    The rule places no additional duties or burdens on state or local government, and hence has no affect on costs to either.
    Notice of Hearing
    Insurance
    NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to the authority granted under s. 601.41 (3) , Stats., and the procedures set forth under s. 227.18 , Stats., the Office of the Commissioner of Insurance will hold a public hearing to consider the adoption of the proposed rulemaking order affecting Section Ins 17.28 (3h) , Wis. Adm. Code, relating to supervision and direction.
    Hearing Information
    Date:   September 9, 2009
    Time:   10:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the
      matter may be reached
    Place:   OCI, Room 227 (2 nd Floor)
      125 South Webster Street
      Madison, WI
    Submission of Written Comments
    Written comments can be mailed to:
    Theresa L. Wedekind
    OCI Rule Comment for Rule Ins 1728
    Office of the Commissioner of Insurance
    PO Box 7873
    Madison WI 53707-7873
    Written comments can be hand delivered to:
    Theresa L. Wedekind
    OCI Rule Comment for Rule Ins 1728
    Office of the Commissioner of Insurance
    125 South Webster St – 2 nd Floor
    Madison WI 53703-3474
    Comments can be emailed to:
    Theresa L. Wedekind
    Comments submitted through the Wisconsin Adm. Rule Web site at: http://adminrules.wisconsin.gov on the proposed rule will be considered.
    The deadline for submitting comments is 4:00 p.m. on the 14 th day after the date for the hearing stated in this Notice of Hearing.
    Copies of Proposed Rule
    A copy of the full text of the proposed rule changes, analysis and fiscal estimate may be obtained from the OCI internet Web site at http://oci.wi.gov/ocirules.htm or by contacting Inger Williams, Public Information and Communications, OCI, at: inger.williams@wisconsin.gov , (608) 264-8110, 125 South Webster Street – 2 nd Floor, Madison WI or PO Box 7873, Madison WI 53707-7873.
    Analysis Prepared by the Office of the Commissioner of Insurance
    Statutes interpreted
    Section 655.005 (2) (a) , Stats.
    Statutory authority
    Sections 601.41 (3) and 655.004 , Stats.
    Explanation of agency authority
    The commissioner of insurance may promulgate such rules under ch. 227 as are necessary to enable the performance of responsibilities under chapter 655 Stats.
    Related statutes or rules
    None
    Plain language analysis
    This rule clarifies what constitutes direction and supervision of a health care provider's employees defined under s. 655.001 (7t) , Wis. Stats., as it relates to the health care provider having employee coverage under the fund.
    Comparison with federal regulations
    To the fund board's and OCI's knowledge there is no existing or proposed federal regulation that is intended to address patient compensation fund administration.
    Comparison of rules in adjacent states
    To the fund board's and OCI's knowledge there are no similar rules in the adjacent states to compare this rule to as none of these states have a patients compensation fund created by statute.
    Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies
    The fund's board of governors established a special committee to review issues related to fund coverage. The committee determined that a rule was needed to clarify the meaning of direction and supervision of health care practitioners. The committee recommended to the board the proposed language and the recommendation was approved by the board.
    Small Business Impact
    This rule does not impose any additional requirements and will have no effect on small businesses.
    The OCI small business coordinator is Eileen Mallow and may be reached at phone number (608) 266-7843 or at email address eileen.mallow@wisconsin.gov
    Fiscal Estimate
    Assumptions used in arriving at fiscal estimate
    The Injured Patients and Families Compensation Fund (IPFCF or Fund) is a segregated fund that provides excess medical malpractice coverage to Wisconsin health care providers. Chapter 655 , Wis. Stats., provides employee coverage to health care providers although specific health care practitioners must practice under the supervision and direction of a physician or CRNA. This rule clarifies supervision and direction and has no fiscal effect.
    There is no effect on GPR.
    State fiscal effect
    None.
    Local government fiscal effect
    None.
    Private sector fiscal effect
    None.
    Long-range fiscal implications
    None.
    Agency Contact Person
    Inger Williams, OCI Services Section, at:
    Phone:   (608) 264-8110
    Address:   125 South Webster Street, 2 nd Floor
      Madison, WI 53703-3474
    Mail:   PO Box 7873
      Madison, WI 53707-7873
    Notice of Hearing
    Transportation
    NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to ss. 84.015 , 84.41 (7) and 347.48 (2m) (e) , Stats., the Department of Transportation will hold a public hearing to consider the amendment of Chapter Trans 315 , Wis. Adm. Code, relating to safety belt medical use exemption.
    Hearing Information
    The hearing will be held:
    September 8, 2009   Hill Farms State Transportation Bldg.
    at 10:00 AM     Room 144-B
       
    4802 Sheboygan Avenue
        Madison, WI
    An interpreter for the hearing impaired will be available on request for this hearing. Parking for persons with disabilities and an accessible entrance are available.
    Submission of Written Comments and Agency Contact
    The public record on this proposed rule making will be held open until close of business the day of the hearing to permit the submission of comments in lieu of public hearing testimony or comments supplementing testimony offered at either hearing. Any such comments should be submitted to Laura Andreasson, Department of Transportation, Division of State Patrol, Room 551, P. O. Box 7936, Madison, WI 53707-7936. You may also contact Laura by phone at (608) 267-5136 or via e-mail at laura.andreasson@ wisconsin.gov.
    To view the proposed amendments to the rule, view the current rule, and submit written comments via e-mail/internet, you may visit the following website: http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/library/research/law/rulenotices.htm .
    Copy of Proposed Rule
    A copy of the rule may be obtained upon request from Laura Andreasson, Department of Transportation, Division of State Patrol, Room 551, P. O. Box 7936, Madison, WI 53707-7936. You may also contact Ms. Andreasson by phone at (608) 267-5136.
    Analysis Prepared by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation
    Statutes interpreted
    Section 347.48 (2m) (e) , Stats.
    Statutory authority
    Sections 84.015 , 84.41 (7) and 347.48 (2m) (e) , Stats.
    Explanation of agency authority
    Current law requires every person over 8 years of age to be properly restrained by a safety belt whenever traveling in a motor vehicle. Current law allows the Department to exempt from this safety belt use requirement any person who, because of a physical or medical condition, cannot properly be restrained in a safety belt. Department rules authorize physicians, chiropractors and Christian Science practitioners to grant exemptions from wearing safety belts. Federal law makes highway safety grant moneys available for safety belt use requirements, but federal law recognizes only medical exemptions issued by physicians. Federal grant moneys expire on July 1, 2009, and this state may not qualify for approximately $15,000,000 in federal moneys if persons other than physicians are authorized to exempt persons from safety belt use laws.
    Related statute or rule
    23 USC 406 , 71 Fed. Reg. 4196 (Jan. 25, 2006).
    Plain language analysis
    This rule making deletes authority of any person other than physicians to exempt persons from safety belt use requirements. This rule making will result in increased use of safety belts, and increase receipt of federal moneys for highway safety activities.
    Comparison with federal regulations
    Federal policy states that safety belt use requirements do not apply to, "Persons with medical conditions who are unable to use a safety belt, provided there is written documentation from a physician." The Department's current rules go further by allowing chiropractors and Christian Science practitioners to grant those exemptions.
    Comparison with rules in adjacent states
    Michigan
    Mich. Comp. Laws. Annot. 257.710e(1)(e) exempts a person who possesses a written statement from a physician from safety belt use requirements. The Department was unable to identify any administrative rules on this topic.
    Minnesota
    Minn. Stats. Annot. § 169.686 (2) (3) allows physicians to exempt persons from safety belt use requirements. The Department was unable to identify any administrative rules on this topic.
    Illinois
    92 IL Admin. Code 1030.84 exempts from safety belt use requirements only to a person "possessing a written statement from a physician that the person is unable, for medical or physical reasons, to wear a seat safety belt."
    Iowa
    IA Admin. Code 761-600.16(321) authorizes physicians and chiropractors to exempt a person from safety belt use requirements for medical reasons. The Department identified no authority for Christian Science practitioners to exempt persons from safety belt use requirements.
    Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies
    None. NHTSA legal counsel informed the Department that in order to qualify for funds under 23 USC 406 , any administrative rule that exempts a person from safety belt use requirements must be consistent with the medical exemption permitted in the implementing guidelines for section 406 eligibility. Those guidelines limit the exemption to physicians.
    Analysis and supporting documentation used to determine effect on small businesses
    This rule making will eliminate one issue of noncompliance specifically identified by NHTSA that makes Wisconsin ineligible for approximately $15,000,000 in federal safety belt use grant moneys.
    Small Business Impact
    This rule making has no effect on small businesses.
    The Department's Regulatory Review Coordinator may be contacted by e-mail at ralph.sanders@wisconsin.gov , or by calling (414) 438-4585.
    Fiscal Estimate
    The Department estimates that there will be no fiscal impact on the liabilities or revenues of any county, city, village, town, school district, vocational, technical and adult education district, sewerage district, or federally-recognized tribes or bands. The Department estimates that there will be no fiscal impact on state or private sector revenues or liabilities.
    Text of Proposed Rule
    SECTION 1. Trans 315.03 (1) (a) and (c) are amended to read:
    Trans 315.03 (1) (a) The person has a written statement signed by a licensed physician , chiropractor or a Christian Science practitioner residing in this state and listed in the Christian Science Journal indicating the person cannot be restrained by a safety belt because of a physical or medical condition, or words to that effect.
    (c) The statement in par. (a) contains an address and telephone number of the physician , chiropractor, or Christian Science practitioner .