Iowa:
Iowa does not have a program similar to Family Care.
Michigan:
Michigan does not have a program similar to Family Care.
Minnesota:
Minnesota does not have a program similar to Family Care.
Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies
The Department assessed the adverse impact on individuals affected by previous changes in benefits as a result of changes in state statute and federal policy.
Small Business Impact
The rules would not have an effect on businesses.
Small business regulatory coordinator
Rosie Greer
608-266-1279
Fiscal Estimate
The proposed rule will have no immediate fiscal impact, but may result in an indeterminate decrease in future costs to the state and to Family Care managed care organizations (MCOs). Some MCOs are units of county government. Some MCOs are private non-profit organizations, which are not small businesses. The potential future decrease in costs to the state and to MCOs will result from not being required to assign staff to conduct or participate in fair hearings in which the appellant cannot be successful. In addition, MCOs may have decreased costs because they will not be required to continue to provide services during an appeal in which the appellant cannot be successful.
Copies of Rules and Fiscal Estimate
A copy of the full text of the rules and the fiscal estimate can be obtained at no charge from the Wisconsin Admin. Rules Website at
http://adminrules.wisconsin.gov
or by contacting the person listed below.
Agency Contact Person
Charles Jones
Division of Long Term Care
1 W. Wilson St., Room 518
P.O. Box 7851
Madison, WI 53707-7851
Phone: (608) 266-0991
TTY: (888) 241-9432
Notice of Hearing
Insurance
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN That pursuant to the authority granted under s.
601.41 (3)
, Stats., and the procedures set forth under s.
227.18
, Stats., the Office of the Commissioner of Insurance (OCI) will hold a public hearing to consider the adoption of rules revising section
Ins 2.81
, Wis. Adm. Code, relating to use of the 1980 CSO Standard Ordinary Life Valuation Mortality Table in determining the minimum standard of valuation reserves and the minimum standard nonforfeiture values for preneed funeral life insurance products.
Hearing Information
Date:
May 7, 2009
Time:
10:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as
the matter may be reached
Place:
OCI, Room 227, 2
nd
Floor
125 South Webster Street
Madison, WI
Submission of Written Comments
Written comments can be mailed to:
James W. Harris
Legal Unit - OCI Rule Comment for Rule Ins 281
Office of the Commissioner of Insurance
PO Box 7873
Madison WI 53707-7873
Written comments can be hand delivered to:
James W. Harris
Legal Unit - OCI Rule Comment for Rule Ins 281
Office of the Commissioner of Insurance
125 South Webster St – 2
nd
Floor
Madison WI 53703-3474
Comments can be emailed to:
James W. Harris
The deadline for submitting comments is 4:00 p.m. on the 14
th
day after the date for the hearing stated in this Notice of Hearing.
Analysis Prepared by the Office of the Commissioner of Insurance (OCI)
Statutes interpreted
Statutory authority
Explanation of agency authority
The proposed rule is promulgated under the commissioner's authority to prescribe valuation and reserve liabilities and accounting standards and reporting for insurers.
Related statutes or rules
The proposed rule relates to existing rules prescribing valuation of liabilities, nonforfeiture values, and actuarial reporting and analysis under ss.
601.42
,
623.06
and
632.43
, Stats., and ss.
Ins 2.80
and ch.
Ins 50
, Wis. Adm. Code.
Plain language analysis
Section
Ins 2.81
, Wis. Adm. Code, sets forth the requirements for use of the 2001 commissioners standard ordinary (CSO) mortality table by insurers, meeting prescribed conditions, in determining minimum reserve liabilities and minimum nonforfeiture values, which may be used for policies issued on or after January 1, 2005, and before January 1, 2009, and which shall be used for policies issued on or after January 1, 2009. Research completed by the Deloitte University of Connecticut Actuarial Center commissioned by the Society of Actuaries as a part of a study of preneed mortality, determined that the 2001 CSO Mortality Table produces inadequate reserves for policies issued to fund funeral services and expenses. The proposed rule provides that for determining the minimum mortality standard for determining reserve liabilities and nonforfeiture values for funeral policies as defined in s.
632.415
, Stats., insurers shall use the 1980 commissioners standard ordinary (CSO) mortality table. Insurers may elect to use the 2001 CSO mortality table for funeral policies issued on or after January 1, 2009, and before January 1, 2012, provided the insurer certifies to the commissioner with supporting information that the reserve methodology employed by the insurer using the 2001 CSO mortality table as a minimum standard develops adequate reserves.
Comparison with federal regulations
There are no federal regulations which address use of mortality tables to establish reserve liabilities and nonforfeiture values for insurers doing business in Wisconsin.
Comparison of rules in adjacent states
Illinois:
Ill. Ch.
215
ILCS 5/223, ff., permits use of the 1980 CSO Standard Ordinary Life Valuation Mortality Table, with apparent permissive authority to use later tables adopted by the NAIC. The regulation does not differentiate for funeral policies.
Iowa:
Iowa Adm. Code 191-94.3, permits the use for purposes of reserve valuation, under prescribed conditions, of the 2001 CSO Preferred Class Structure Mortality Table. The regulation does not differentiate for funeral policies.
Michigan:
Mich. Comp. Laws, s.
500.838
a, permits the use for purposes of reserve valuation, under prescribed conditions, of the 2001 CSO Preferred Class Structure Mortality Table. The regulation does not differentiate for funeral policies.
Minnesota:
Minn. Stat. Ch. 61A.257, permits the use for purposes of reserve valuation, under prescribed conditions, of the 2001 CSO Preferred Class Structure Mortality Table. The regulation does not differentiate for funeral policies.
Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies
OCI review of NAIC models and recommendations based upon preneed mortality studies with respect to the adequacy of financial reserves, and insurer's financial information.
Analysis and supporting documentation used to determine rule's effect on small businesses
This rule relates to insurer determination of minimum reserves and there is no significant effect on small businesses.
Small Business Impact
This rule will have little or no effect on small businesses.
Small business regulatory coordinator
The OCI small business coordinator is Eileen Mallow and may be reached at phone number (608) 266-7843 or at email address
eileen.mallow@wisconsin.gov
Fiscal Estimate
Summary
There will be no state or local government fiscal effect.
This rule change will have no significant effect on the private sector regulated by OCI.
State fiscal effect
None.
Local government fiscal effect
None.
Long-range fiscal implications
None.
Copies of Proposed Rule and Agency Contact Person
A copy of the full text of the proposed rule changes, analysis and fiscal estimate may be obtained from the Web site at:
http://oci.wi.gov/ocirules.htm
or by contacting:
Inger Williams, OCI Services Section
Phone:
(608) 264-8110
Address:
125 South Webster Street, 2
nd
Floor
PO Box 7873, Madison WI 53707-7873
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Labor and Industry Review Commission
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN That pursuant to s.
103.04 (2)
, Stats., and according to the procedure set forth in s.
227.16 (2) (e)
, Stats., the Labor and Industry Review Commission
will adopt the following rule as proposed in this notice, without public hearing
unless, within 30 days after publication of this notice on April 15, 2009
, the Labor and Industry Review Commission is petitioned for a public hearing by 25 natural persons who will be affected by the rule; a municipality that will be affected by the rule; or an association that is representative of a farm, labor, business or professional group that will be affected by the rule.
The Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission proposes an order to amend sections
LIRC 1.025 (3)
and
(4)
,
2.05
,
3.05
, and
4.04
, relating to the rules of practice and procedure before the commission.
Submission of Written Comments
Written comments pertaining to the proposed rules should be submitted to the Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission, P.O. Box 8126, Madison WI 53708-8126. Facsimile: (608) 267-4409.
The deadline for submission is 30 days from the date of the publication of the 30 day notice in this Register.
Copies of Proposed Rules
A copy of the proposed rules and the full fiscal estimate may be obtained from the Labor and Industry Review Commission upon request.
Analysis Prepared by Labor and Industry Review Commission
Statutes interpreted
Statutory authority
Explanation of agency authority
The Labor and Industry Review commission reviews and decides appeals of decisions of administrative law judges of the Department of Workforce Development in cases arising under Wisconsin's unemployment insurance, workers compensation, employment discrimination and public accommodations discrimination laws. The commission's rules govern procedure in such appeals.
Related statute or rule
No federal statute or regulation requires adoption of the proposed rules or are relevant to the substance of the proposed rules. Wisconsin Statutes ss.
102.23(1)(a)
,
227.53(1)(a)3.
and
801.50(2)(a)
establish the circuit court venue provisions clarified in the rule amendments at LIRC 2.05, 3.05 and 4.04.
Plain language analysis
Current rules allow petition for commission review from decisions by administrative law judges of the Department of Workforce Development to be filed by facsimile transmission. Under the rule, petitions faxed and received on a given day are considered to have been received on that day, for purposes of determining timeliness, even if they are received after regular office hours. The LIRC rule conflicts with the rule of the DWD Equal Rights Division (ERD), which treats faxed documents received after regular office hours as having been received on the next business day. The ERD rule applies, because ERD is the only authorized entity to accept petitions for commission review from ERD decisions. This proposal amends the LIRC rule to clarify the special timeliness circumstances applicable to petitions from ERD decisions.
Current s.
LIRC 1.025 (4)
contains a reference to the internet page for filing a LIRC petition for review in UI. A DWD agency wide email migration changes the internet "address" or page to a revised format, which is substituted in the proposed rule.
Current LIRC rules regarding judicial review erroneously state that out of state plaintiffs or petitioners should commence actions for judicial review in Dane County. This is based on outdated statutory and case law. Sections
801.50 (2) (a)
and
227.53 (1) (a) 3.
, of the statutes provide that actions for judicial review by out of state plaintiffs or petitioners shall be commenced in the county where the claim or dispute arose. The proposed rule amendment corrects the error.
Comparison with federal regulations
There are no federal regulations governing practice and procedure before the commission.
Comparison with rules in adjacent states
Adjacent states have higher-level administrative authorities (excepting Minnesota) for deciding appeals in unemployment insurance, workers compensation and employment discrimination cases which are analogous to the Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission. Rules of practice of such authorities are generally comparable to those of the commission.
Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies
The commission has not collected any data or conducted any analyses in connection with its development of these proposed rule changes.
Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small business
The commission has not collected any data or conducted any analyses in connection with its development of these proposed rule changes.
Small Business Impact
The commission's rules of procedure affect small businesses when they are parties to cases pending before the commission. The proposed rule changes simply clarify existing rules and are not anticipated to have any effect on small businesses.
Fiscal Estimate
Assumptions used in arriving at fiscal estimate
These minor rule changes involve only clarification of existing procedural matters, including the filing of electronic appeals to the commission and the proper venue for circuit court review of commission decisions when the plaintiff or petitioner is a non-resident of Wisconsin. Neither clarification should have any fiscal impact on members of the public who file the affected appeals or the commission in dealing with the appeals.
State fiscal effect
None.
Local government fiscal effect
None.
Long-range fiscal implications
None.
Agency Contact Person
James Pflasterer, General Counsel
Telephone: (608) 266-7728
Text of Proposed Rule
SECTION 1. LIRC 1.025 (3) and (4) are amended to read:
LIRC 1.025 (3) Petitions for review may be filed by facsimile transmission. A petition for review transmitted by facsimile is not deemed filed unless and until the petition is received and printed at the recipient facsimile machine of the commission or of the division of the department to which the petition is being transmitted. The party transmitting a petition by facsimile is solely responsible for ensuring its timely receipt. The commission is not responsible for errors or failures in transmission.
A
Except in the case of a petition for review in fair employment and public accommodations cases under s.106.52 or s.111.39(5) Stats., where a facsimile transmission filed after the regular business hours of the equal rights division shall be considered filed on the next business day, a
petition for review transmitted by facsimile is deemed filed on the date of transmission recorded and printed by the facsimile machine on the petition. If the commission's or department's records indicate receipt of the facsimile at a date later than that shown, then the later date shall control.
(4) Except in the case of petitions for review in fair employment and public accommodations cases under s.
106.52
or
111.39(5)
, Stats., petitions for review may be filed electronically through the internet website of the commission, at the page found at
http://www.dwd.state.wi.us/lirc/petition. htm
http://dwd.wisconsin.gov/lirc/petition.htm
. Successful filing of a petition for review electronically through the internet website of the commission will result in a display on the petitioner's internet browser of a message confirming that the petition has been successfully filed. A petition for review transmitted electronically through the website of the commission is not deemed filed unless and until the confirmation message is displayed. The commission is not responsible for errors in transmission that result in failure of a petition to be successfully filed electronically through the website of the commission. A petition for review filed electronically through the internet website of the commission is deemed filed on the date of filing stated on the commission's electronic record of the filing.
SECTION 2. LIRC 2.05 is amended to read:
LIRC 2.05 Actions for judicial review. Judicial review of any commission decision under s.
108.09
or
108.10
, Stats., shall be commenced in the manner and upon the grounds specified in ss.
108.09(7)
and
102.23
, Stats., and not under ch.
227
or s.
801.02
, Stats. Either party may commence a legal action for review of the commission decision in circuit court within 30 days from the date the decision was mailed to the party's last known address. Such action is commenced only by filing a summons and complaint with the circuit court and serving an authenticated copy of the summons and the complaint upon the commission, all within 30 days. Service must be made upon a commissioner of the labor and industry review commission or an agent authorized by the commission to accept service only at the commission's office in Madison. Such service shall be deemed complete service on all parties but there shall be left with the person so served as many copies of the summons and complaint as there are defendants. Service by mail is effective only if the pleadings are actually received by the commission within the appeal period. The complaint shall state the grounds upon which review is sought. The action shall be commenced against the commission, and the party in whose favor the decision was made shall also be made a defendant. The proceedings shall be in the circuit court of the county where the plaintiff resides except that, if the plaintiff is a state agency, the proceedings shall be in the circuit court of the county where the defendant resides. If the plaintiff is a non-resident of Wisconsin, the proceedings shall be in the circuit court
for Dane county
for the county where the claim arose
. The proceedings may be brought in any circuit court if all parties stipulate and that court agrees. The appealing party shall arrange for preparation of the necessary legal documents.
SECTION 3. LIRC 3.05 is amended to read:
LIRC 3.05 Actions for judicial review. Judicial review of any commission decision shall be commenced in the manner and upon the grounds specified in s.102.23, Stats., and not under ch.
227
, Stats., or s.
801.02
, Stats. Either party may commence a legal action for review of the commission decision in circuit court within 30 days from the date the decision was mailed to the party's last known address. Such action is commenced only by filing a summons and complaint with the circuit court and serving an authenticated copy of the summons and the complaint upon the commission, all within 30 days. Service must be made upon a commissioner of the labor and industry review commission or an agent authorized by the commission to accept service only at the commission's office in Madison. Such service shall be deemed complete service on all parties but there shall be left with the person so served as many copies of the summons and complaint as there are defendants. Service by mail is effective only if the pleadings are actually received by the commission within the appeal period. The complaint shall state the grounds upon which review is sought. The action shall be commenced against the commission, and the party in whose favor the decision was made shall also be made a defendant. The proceedings shall be in the circuit court of the county where the plaintiff resides except that, if the plaintiff is a state agency, the proceedings shall be in the circuit court of the county where the defendant resides. If the plaintiff is a non-resident of Wisconsin, the proceedings shall be in the circuit court
for Dane county
for the county where the claim arose
. The proceedings may be brought in any circuit court if all parties stipulate and that court agrees. The appealing party shall arrange for preparation of the necessary legal documents.
SECTION 4. LIRC 4.04 (1) is amended to read:
LIRC 4.04 Actions for judicial review. (1) FAIR EMPLOYMENT. Judicial review of any commission order or decision in fair employment cases under s.
111.39(5)
, Stats., shall be commenced in the manner and upon the grounds specified in ss.
227.52
and
227.53
, Stats. Any person aggrieved by a final decision of the commission shall be entitled to judicial review in circuit court. Proceedings for review shall be instituted within 30 days from the date of the decision. Such proceedings are instituted by serving a petition for review, either personally or by certified mail, upon the labor and industry review commission in Madison, and, by filing such petition with the clerk of the circuit court for the county where the judicial review proceedings are to be held. Copies of the petition shall be served upon all parties who appeared before the commission in the case not later than 30 days after commencing the proceeding for review. The copies shall be served personally, by certified mail, or when service is timely admitted in writing, by first class mail. The petition shall state the nature of the petitioner's interest, the facts showing that the petitioner is a person aggrieved by the decision, and the grounds upon which review is sought. The petition shall be entitled in the name of the person serving it as petitioner and the commission as respondent. The proceedings shall be in the circuit court of the county where the petitioner resides. If the petitioner is a non-resident of the state, the proceedings shall be in the circuit court
for Dane county
for the county where the dispute arose
.
Notice of Hearing
Natural Resources
Fish, Game, etc., Chs. NR 1—
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to ss.
29.014
,
29.089
,
29.193
,
29.197
,
29.597
,
169.085
,
169.24
, and
227.11
, Stats., the Department of Natural Resources will hold public hearings on revisions to Chapters
NR 10
and
19
, Wis. Adm. Code, relating to hunting, trapping regulations, and wildlife rehabilitation.
Hearing Information
Date and Time:
|
Location:
|
May 11, 2009
|
Room 613
|
Monday
|
DNR Central Office
|
at 1:00 PM
|
101 South Webster Street
Madison
|
Pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, reasonable accommodations, including the provision of informational material in an alternative format, will be provided for qualified individuals with disabilities upon request. Please call Scott Loomans at (608) 267-2452 with specific information on your request at least 10 days before the date of the scheduled hearing.
Submission of Written Comments
The proposed rule and fiscal estimate may be reviewed and comments electronically submitted at the following Internet site:
http://adminrules.wisconsin.gov
. Written comments on the proposed rule may be submitted via U.S. mail to Mr. Scott Loomans, Bureau of Wildlife Management, P.O. Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707. Comments may be submitted until May 11, 2009. Written comments whether submitted electronically or by U.S. mail will have the same weight and effect as oral statements presented at the public hearing.
Copies of Proposed Rule
A personal copy of the proposed rule and fiscal estimate may be obtained from Mr. Scott Loomans at the address listed above.
Analysis Prepared by Department of Natural Resources
Statutes interpreted
Statutory authority
Plain language analysis
The intent of these rule changes is to correct drafting errors, provide clarification to existing rules, simplify regulations, and update administrative code language and references. Policy issues affected by this rule are ones which have already been addressed by previous rulemaking. The proposed rules will:
1.
Clarify that access permits are required of deer hunters at Lake Wissota state park.
2.
Clarify that the harvest of deer of either sex is allowed by archery and gun hunters who possess disabled hunting permits, making this regulation consistent with the law that applies to disabled hunters during firearm seasons.
3.
Clarify that, where it is legal to place bait for hunting deer, bait may be placed on the day before the archery season as is currently allowed on the day before the gun seasons.
4.
Remove the prohibition of hunting deer with full metal jacketed, nonexpanding type bullets so that only nonexpanding type bullets are prohibited.
5.
Establish that the prohibition of hunting and firearm discharge on the day before the firearm deer season applies only to the traditional nine-day deer season.
6.
Establish that velvet antlers may be possessed in a CWD zone and clarifies that antlers being transported out of a CWD zone must be free of brain tissue but hair or hide does not need to be removed.
7.
Incorporate by reference the definitions for a section of federal regulations that are already incorporated into Wisconsin code related to baiting migratory game birds.
8.
Eliminate an unnecessary cross reference.
9.
Eliminate confusing and unnecessary language and clarifies that, where body-gripping type traps from 60 to 75 square inches in size are prohibited, larger traps are also prohibited.
10.
Eliminate an unnecessary gear requirement; relaxing mechanical locks are not needed on snares.
11.
Eliminate a limit on participation by disabled hunters during turkey seasons that is no longer needed with only seven turkey management zones.
12.
Correct an omission in the name of a deer management unit.
13.
Include trapping as an educational outdoor skills activity for which certain exemptions are available so that this rule language will be consistent with statute.
14.
Clarify that volunteer wildlife rehabilitators may only serve in a limited capacity on wildlife rehabilitation activities.
15.
Correct the number of a subdivision.
16.
Update wildlife rehabilitation code language so that it is consistent with proposed changes to the list of threatened and endangered species.
Related statute or rule
There are no state rules or statutes currently under promulgation that directly relate to the provisions that are proposed in this administrative order.
Comparison with rules in adjacent states
These rule change proposals do not represent significant policy changes and do not differ significantly from surrounding states. All surrounding states have regulations and rules in place for the management and recreational use of wild game and furbearer species that are established based on needs that are unique to that state's resources and public desires.
Comparison with federal regulations
These state rules and statutes do not relieve individuals from the restrictions, requirements and conditions of federal statutes and regulations. Regulating the hunting and trapping of native species has been delegated to state fish and wildlife agencies. Additionally, none of the proposed rules exceed the authorities granted to states in
50 CFR part 10
.
Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies
This rule order is necessary to correct inconsistencies created through the promulgation of other rules and statutes, update code language, correct previous drafting errors, and to clarify existing administrative code language. The rule changes included in this order do not deviate from current department policy on the management of wildlife and the regulation of hunting and trapping.
Small Business Impact
These rules are applicable to individual sportspersons and impose no compliance or reporting requirements for small businesses, and no design or operational standards are contained in the rule.
Pursuant to s.
227.114
, Stats., it is not anticipated that the proposed rules will have a significant economic impact on small businesses.
Small business regulatory coordinator
Environmental Impact
The Department has made a preliminary determination that this action does not involve significant adverse environmental effects and does not need an environmental analysis under ch.
NR 150
, Wis. Adm. Code. However, based on the comments received, the Department may prepare an environmental analysis before proceeding with the proposal. This environmental review document would summarize the Department's consideration of the impacts of the proposal and reasonable alternatives.
Fiscal Estimate
Summary
The intent of these rule changes is to correct drafting errors, provide clarification to existing rules, simplify regulations, and update administrative code language and references. The department anticipates no fiscal effect from these proposed rule changes.
State fiscal effect
None.
Local government fiscal effect
None.
Long-range fiscal implications
No long-range fiscal implications are anticipated.
Agency Contact Person
Scott Loomans
101 South Webster Street
PO Box 7921
Madison, WI 53707-7921
(608) 267-2452
scott.loomans @wisconsin.gov
